画像生成速度比較 A1111 vs Forge vs SD.Next 【Stability Matrix】
TLDRThe video discusses the user experience with the Stable Diffusion web interface and its upgrade to version 4G, highlighting the ease of installation and improved image generation capabilities. It compares the performance of different versions of AI image generation software, emphasizing the increased speed and efficiency, particularly with GPU memory utilization. The video also touches on the challenges of using shared memory and the potential for future improvements in the software.
Takeaways
- 🎵 The video discusses the use of Stable Diffusion for image generation and highlights the user interface programs available for this purpose.
- 🖼️ Stability Matrix is a well-known platform that simplifies the installation of Stable Diffusion with just a few mouse clicks.
- 🔄 The Stability Matrix has been updated to support the new Sub Diffusion WEBUI 4G, making the installation process even more straightforward.
- 🚀 The new version of Stability Matrix has improved the image generation speed and reduced GPU memory usage, leading to fewer instances of out-of-memory errors.
- 🌐 The video compares the image generation speed of different versions of A111 and SD.NEXT, noting that the latest versions offer significant performance improvements.
- 💻 The testing environment for the image generation speed comparison includes a PC with a Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, 32GB main memory, and an RTX 4070TI GPU with 12GB video memory.
- 📸 The video demonstrates that the latest versions of A111 and SD.NEXT can generate images faster, with A111 version 1.8 showing slightly better initial performance.
- 🔧 The video also discusses the challenges of adding new features to A111, which can sometimes disrupt existing functionalities and lead to confusion.
- 🔄 The video shows that using the new features of Stable Diffusion, such as the Yuneta Patcher, can make it easier to extend the capabilities of the software.
- 🚦 The video encounters issues with SD.NEXT and version 1.7, where both versions eventually fail due to memory management issues, highlighting the need for further optimization.
- 📈 The video concludes with a recommendation to use the latest version of Fuji for image generation, as it can handle multiple image generations simultaneously without significant performance degradation.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video script?
-The main topic of the video script is the discussion of using the stable diffusion web UI for image generation and the comparison of different versions of AI programs for this purpose.
What is the significance of the Stability Matrix in the context of the script?
-The Stability Matrix is significant because it is a tool that allows users to install the stable diffusion web UI with just a few mouse clicks, making the process of setting up the image generation environment much easier.
What new feature does the Stability Matrix support after its version upgrade?
-After the version upgrade, the Stability Matrix supports the new sub diffusion web UI 4G, which simplifies the installation process further.
How does the new version of the AI program affect image generation?
-The new version of the AI program improves image generation speed and reduces GPU memory usage, which in turn decreases the instances of out-of-memory errors and allows for the creation of larger images or a greater number of simultaneous image generations.
What is the significance of the 'Yuneta Patcher' mentioned in the script?
-The 'Yuneta Patcher' is a new mechanism that makes it easier to extend the functionality of the stable diffusion, potentially adding new features and capabilities to the image generation process.
What were the specifications of the computer used for the AI program's image generation speed comparison?
-The computer used for the comparison had a Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, 32GB of main memory, an RTX 4070 TI GPU, and 12GB of video memory.
What command line option was used for the comparison of image generation speed between versions?
-The command line option used for the comparison was 'X4', which does not specify any particular options and focuses on comparing the raw image generation speed.
What was the outcome of the image generation speed comparison between different versions of the AI program?
-The comparison showed that version 4G was faster, followed by version 1.8, and then version 1.7. However, both version 1.7 and 1.8 eventually failed due to memory issues, with version 1.7 becoming stable at the 50% mark.
What issue arose when using shared memory in the AI program?
-Using shared memory caused the AI program to become extremely slow and eventually unresponsive, leading to a situation where the program was unable to continue generating images.
What is the potential downside of the increased speed and efficiency of the AI program?
-The potential downside is that some extension features may not be compatible with the faster versions of the AI program, and creators will need to spend time confirming the functionality in both environments, which could lead to a delay in the adoption of new community-created extensions.
How does the video script conclude?
-The video script concludes by summarizing the findings from the image generation speed comparison and expressing surprise at the results, especially the failure of the newer versions due to memory issues. The script ends with a call to action for viewers to subscribe to the channel and provide high ratings.
Outlines
🎨 Introduction to Stable Diffusion and Performance Comparison
This paragraph introduces the use of Stable Diffusion for image generation and mentions the availability of a user-friendly interface program called Stability Matrix. It highlights the ease of installation of the Stability Matrix due to recent updates and the support for 4G. The improvements in the software are discussed, emphasizing reduced VRAM usage and increased image generation speed, as well as the ability to generate larger images and handle more batches simultaneously. The paragraph also touches on the challenges faced with the new features in A111 and the potential for existing features to be disrupted. A comparison of image generation speeds between different versions of A111 and SD.NEXT is presented, with a focus on the performance of the system with a Ryzen 7 3700x CPU, 32GB of RAM, and an RTX 4070TI GPU with 12GB of VRAM.
🚀 Batch Processing and Memory Management
The second paragraph delves into the benefits of batch processing in Stable Diffusion, exploring the possibility of increasing batch size to improve speed. It discusses the impact of using more than two simultaneous image generations and the potential for speed improvements. The paragraph also addresses the challenges of memory management, particularly the use of shared memory and the issues that arise when VRAM is insufficient. The improvements in NVIDIA's video drivers are noted, which have allowed the system to utilize main memory when VRAM is not enough, eliminating out-of-memory errors. However, the paragraph also points out that relying on shared memory significantly slows down the system, rendering it unusable. The performance of different versions of the software is compared, with version 1.8 showing a slight delay but ultimately producing the same results as other versions. The paragraph concludes with a discussion on the challenges of optimizing memory usage and the potential for future improvements in the software.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Stable Diffusion
💡Stability Matrix
💡WEB UI 4G
💡GPU Memory
💡Video Memory
💡Batch Processing
💡AI Image Generation
💡Out of Memory Errors
💡Shared Memory
💡Community Extensions
💡Performance Optimization
Highlights
Stable Diffusion is a popular tool for generating images using a user-friendly interface program.
Stability Matrix has made it easy to install Stable Diffusion with just a few mouse clicks.
The new update to Stability Matrix now supports the Sub Diffusion WEB UI 4G, making installation even more straightforward.
The improvements in the new version have led to faster image generation and reduced GPU memory usage.
The reduction in video memory usage has resulted in fewer instances of out-of-memory errors, allowing for larger image generation.
The new version also enables the creation of more batches of image generation simultaneously.
A new mechanism called Yuneta Patcher is introduced to make extending Stable Diffusion easier.
The current A111 has increased in size, which can sometimes cause existing functionalities to break when new features are added.
A comparison of image generation speeds between different versions of the software is conducted using a PC with a Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, 32GB of main memory, and an RTX 4070TI GPU with 12GB of video memory.
The A111 version 1.8.0 has been released, boasting improvements in speed.
A side-by-side comparison of image generation between A111 and SD.NEXT shows that A111 is faster.
SD.NEXT encountered issues and had to retire, possibly due to overuse of shared memory.
Version 1.7 of A111 also encountered issues and retired during the 6th image output stage, likely due to shared memory usage.
The video discusses the potential of using batch sizes to increase the speed of image generation.
Fuji allows for batch sizes to be increased without issue, which can lead to faster overall image generation.
The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to subscribe to the channel and leave a high rating.
