AI Generated Furry Art!? Can It Be Used To Make Furry Art Commissions?
TLDRThe video explores the use of AI in generating furry art, discussing the controversy around it being considered art theft. The creator tests AI art generation by using descriptions of fursonas from Twitter users, inputting them into an AI art generator called NightCaff, and sharing the results. The outcome is a mix of bizarre and sometimes humorous images that fail to meet expectations, highlighting the limitations of AI in replacing human artists.
Takeaways
- 🎨 AI-generated art is a controversial topic within the furry community, as it is seen by some as a form of art theft.
- 🖌️ The creator decided to experiment with AI art by using descriptions of fursonas and activities provided by Twitter users.
- 🌐 The AI art generator used in the video is called NightCaff, which offers various style options for the art.
- 🦖 The first prompt was a 'parasaurolophus made of watermelon', which resulted in an incomplete and inaccurate representation.
- 🐺 A prompt for a 'brown wolf with a small scar and blue bone making Animal Crossing jokes' led to a bizarre and unrelated image.
- 🦊 Another attempt with a 'great white and tan coyote gaming' resulted in a decent painting-like image, but lacked gaming elements.
- 🚗 A 'red fluffy fox doing donuts in a Tesco car park with a GT86' led to a stylized image with some inaccuracies.
- 🧶 A 'green and brown domestic cat that knits' resulted in a pop art style image with a cat wearing a knitted hoodie.
- 🐢 The simple prompt 'turtle' was met with an unimpressive result that was not what was expected.
- 🎨 The creator concluded that AI art generation is not ready to replace real artists and recommended supporting them instead.
- 😂 The overall experience with AI-generated art was filled with unexpected and often humorous results, showcasing the limitations of current AI art technology.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is the exploration of AI-generated art, specifically in the context of furry art commissions.
What is the controversy surrounding AI-generated art in the furry community?
-The controversy is that AI-generated art is seen by some as a form of art theft, as the computer is accused of simply taking pre-existing images and combining them without originality.
How did the speaker obtain descriptions for the AI art generator?
-The speaker obtained descriptions for the AI art generator by asking people on Twitter to describe their fursonas and an activity or item, without revealing the purpose behind the request.
Which website was used for generating the AI art?
-The website used for generating the AI art was called NightCaff.
What was the first description the speaker decided to input into the AI art generator?
-The first description was of a parasaurolophus made of watermelon.
What style options were available on the AI art generator?
-The AI art generator offered styles such as regular NightCaff style, artistic portrait, modern comic, and others.
How did the AI-generated image of the parasaurolophus made of watermelon turn out?
-The AI-generated image resulted in a partially formed parasaur with a watermelon-colored body but without key components like a face or tail.
What was the speaker's overall impression of the AI-generated art?
-The speaker was underwhelmed and found the results to be a mix of gibberish and random images, concluding that AI art generation is not ready to replace real artists.
What advice does the speaker give to those seeking art commissions?
-The speaker advises people to commission art from real artists, supporting their work and paying for the unique creations they desire.
How did the speaker engage with the AI-generated art results?
-The speaker engaged by critiquing each AI-generated image, often humorously pointing out the discrepancies and absurdities in the results.
Outlines
🎨 AI Art Experiment Introduction
The speaker introduces an AI art experiment, expressing curiosity about the controversial topic of AI-generated art. They mention the common critique that AI art is essentially theft, as it uses pre-existing images. To explore this, the speaker conducted a Twitter poll asking people to describe their fursonas and an activity or item, with the intention of inputting these descriptions into an AI art generator to see the results.
🐺 AI Art Creation Process
The speaker describes the process of creating AI art using a website called NightCaff. They have collected descriptions from Twitter and are inputting them into the AI generator to see what kind of art is produced. The speaker discusses the different style options provided by the AI, such as CGI character and modern comic, and shares their thought process in selecting the styles for each description. The results are a mix of bizarre and unexpected images, leading to a humorous critique of the AI's capabilities.
🕹️ Gaming and Car Enthusiast AI Art
The speaker shares the AI-generated art results for descriptions related to gaming and cars. They discuss the challenges of capturing the essence of a gaming scenario with a white and tan coyote and the unsuccessful attempt at creating an image of a red fluffy box doing donuts in a Tesco car park with a GT86. The AI's output is described as stylized and not entirely accurate to the prompts, but still interesting.
🎮 AI's Struggle with Simple Prompts
The speaker continues to explore AI-generated art with simpler prompts, such as creating an image of a turtle and an Irish cat dragon. The results are varied, with the turtle image being a straightforward delivery of a real turtle picture, while the Irish cat dragon turns out to be an angry cat with dragon teeth and an unspecified Irish influence. The speaker comments on the AI's limitations and suggests that real artists won't be replaced by AI anytime soon.
🐱 Bizarre and Whimsical AI Creations
The speaker presents more AI-generated art based on prompts like a Swedish dog doing tomfoolery, a gray cat with a bomb, and a blue dragon that shoots blue fire. The results are described as wild, bizarre, and sometimes off-target, with the AI creating images that are a mix of abstract shapes, unexpected elements, and sometimes even nightmarish combinations. The speaker maintains a humorous tone throughout, poking fun at the AI's output.
🎭 Mixed Results and Final Thoughts
The speaker concludes the AI art experiment by sharing the final set of generated images, which include a pyromaniac wolf, a gray cat with purple hair, a black jaguar, and a blue wolf with brown hair and beard. The AI's output is again a mix of strange and whimsical images, with some closer to the original prompts than others. The speaker reflects on the overall experience, stating that while AI art can produce some wild and entertaining results, it still has a long way to go before it can replace human artists.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Generated Art
💡Furry Art
💡Fursona
💡Art Theft
💡NightCaff
💡CGI Character
💡Modern Comic
💡Anime Style
💡Gaming
💡Art Commissions
Highlights
AI generated art is a controversial topic within the furry community, as some view it as a form of art theft.
The creator decided to experiment with AI art by using descriptions of fursonas from Twitter users, without their prior knowledge.
The AI art generator used in this experiment is called NightCaff, which offers various style options for the generated art.
The first prompt was a parasaurolophus made of watermelon, which resulted in an incomplete and inaccurate representation.
A brown wolf with a small scar and blue bone that makes Animal Crossing jokes was another prompt, leading to a bizarre and unrelated outcome.
The AI struggled to incorporate specific elements like gaming chairs and headphones into the generated art.
A request for a great white and tan coyote gaming led to a stylized but inaccurate representation, lacking the gaming aspect.
The AI's attempt at creating a red fluffy box doing donuts in a Tesco car park resulted in a stylized car instead of a fox character.
A green and brown domestic cat that knits yielded a pop art-style image with unusual features, such as leaves on the cat's whiskers.
The simple prompt of 'turtle' resulted in a photo-like image, suggesting the AI primarily sourced from existing images rather than creating new ones.
The Irish cat dragon prompt led to an angry cat with dragon teeth and an unspecified Irish influence.
A Swedish dog that does tomfoolery resulted in an abstract and unrecognizable image, highlighting the AI's limitations in understanding context.
A gray cat with a bomb resulted in a mix of unrelated elements, showing the AI's inability to generate coherent art based on complex prompts.
The blue dragon that shoots blue fire prompt produced a怪异的形象 with multiple wings and an unconventional body structure.
The AI's output was inconsistent and often unrelated to the prompts, suggesting that AI-generated art cannot yet replace the creativity of human artists.
The creator concludes that AI-generated art is far from being able to produce stable and accurate commissions, and encourages supporting real artists.
The experiment showcased the AI's tendency to produce wild and nonsensical results, which can be entertaining but lack practical value.
