Dezgo Vs Runway. Image AI Generators. Image to Image. Text to image.
TLDRThe video compares two AI image generators, Dezgo and Runway, focusing on their image-to-image capabilities. Dezgo is highlighted as a free option, while Runway, which isn't free, is noted for its higher quality outputs. The comparison involves various prompts, including generating images of clothes, an anatomically correct human neck, and a scientific depiction of lungs. Despite Dezgo's free access, its inability to accurately capture the prompts leads to dissatisfaction, making Runway the preferred choice for precision, despite its cost.
Takeaways
- 🔍 The video compares two AI image generators: Dezgo and Runway.
- 🆓 Dezgo is a free AI image generator, while Runway is not free.
- 🖼️ The comparison focuses on the image to image function of both generators.
- 📈 Dezgo's performance in generating images is found to be less precise.
- 🎨 Runway, despite not being free, delivers better and more precise image generation.
- 👕 A test with the prompt 'read new clothes' results in unsatisfactory outcomes for Dezgo.
- 🧠 When tasked with generating an anatomically correct human neck, both generators have issues, but Runway performs better.
- 🔄 Experiments with different engines within Dezgo show little variation in output quality.
- 📝 A prompt involving 'pneumaticties Giro SC', a microbe, yields unsatisfactory results for Dezgo.
- 🫁 The comparison also includes generating images of human lungs, with Runway providing a more accurate representation.
- 👎 The video creator does not recommend Dezgo for precise image generation tasks.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is a comparison between Dezgo and Runway, two AI image generators, focusing on their image to image functionality.
How does the video start?
-The video starts with the host introducing Dezgo as an AI image generator that is completely free to use.
What is the first task given to both AI generators?
-The first task given to both AI generators is to generate an image of a human wearing new clothes based on a provided sample image.
What was the host's opinion on the results produced by Dezgo?
-The host was not satisfied with the results produced by Dezgo, stating that it failed to understand the concept of human self and the output was not good.
How does the video compare the performance of Dezgo and Runway?
-The video compares the performance of Dezgo and Runway by giving them the same tasks and prompts, and then evaluating the quality and accuracy of the generated images.
What was the outcome of the human neck anatomy task?
-The outcome of the human neck anatomy task showed that Runway produced a more accurate and precise image compared to Dezgo, which the host found disappointing.
What different types of engines did the video mention for the AI generators?
-The video mentioned different types of engines such as Stable Diffusion, Epic Diffusion 1.1, and Fusion 2.1 for the AI generators.
What was the host's final verdict on Dezgo?
-The host concluded that Dezgo is not good and is essentially useless, recommending against its use.
What was the third task given to the AI generators?
-The third task given to the AI generators was to generate an image of pneumaticites giro, a type of microbe.
How does the video conclude in terms of the comparison?
-The video concludes that Runway is much better than Dezgo in terms of image generation quality and precision, despite not being free and still requiring improvement.
What does the host suggest at the end of the video?
-The host suggests that viewers should subscribe to their channel and give a thumbs up if they liked the video, indicating a call to action for audience engagement.
Outlines
🎨 AI Image Generators: Tesco vs Runway
This paragraph introduces a comparison between Tesco, a free AI image generator, and Runway, a non-free alternative. The speaker aims to evaluate the precision and quality of both engines by uploading a sample image and providing prompts such as 'new clothes' and 'human neck anatomically correct'. The initial results from Tesco and Runway are discussed, with the speaker expressing dissatisfaction with Tesco's inability to grasp the concept of human self and the lack of quality in its outputs. In contrast, Runway's results are deemed much better, showing a significant difference in the outputs even with the same prompts and images.
🔍 Further Analysis of AI Image Generators
The speaker continues the comparison by testing different versions of Tesco's stable diffusion and other engines like epic diffusion and Fusion 2.1. Despite changing engines and prompts, the results from Tesco remain unsatisfactory, with the speaker noting that the outputs are not what was expected. In contrast, Runway's performance is praised for its precision and quality, even when given the same tasks. The speaker also discusses the limitations of Tesco, emphasizing its lack of utility despite being free, and reiterates the superior performance of Runway in generating images that are closer to the desired outcome.
👋 Conclusion on AI Image Generators
In the final paragraph, the speaker wraps up the comparison by summarizing the performance of both Tesco and Runway. Tesco is deemed ineffective, with the speaker advising against its use, while Runway, despite its cost, is recognized for producing better quality images. The speaker acknowledges that Runway is not accessible to everyone due to its price but encourages viewers to explore the free options available on the platform. The video concludes with a call for likes and subscriptions for the channel, thanking the viewers for their interest.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI image generator
💡Image to Image
💡Text to image
💡Precision
💡Tesco
💡Runway is a paid AI image generator service that is compared to Tesco in the video. While it is not free, the video suggests that Runway offers better image generation quality and precision than Tesco. The comparison highlights the differences in performance between free and paid AI image generation tools.
💡Prompt
💡Anatomically correct
💡Stable diffusion
💡Pneumococcus
Highlights
Tesco is an AI image generator that is completely free to use.
The comparison is between Tesco's image generator and Runway's image to image function.
There are many free text to image generators, but image to image generators often lack high quality.
The test begins with uploading a simple image and providing a prompt, 'read new clothes'.
Runway's image generator is not free, which adds to the interest in seeing how it performs.
The initial result from the image to image generator is not satisfactory, failing to grasp the concept of human self.
Runway also does not perform well, losing details like 'nucleus' and 'big new clothes'.
Different types of engines are tested, but the results are not as expected.
The anatomy of a human neck is used as a prompt to test the generators' precision.
Tesco's output for the human neck prompt is highly unsatisfactory.
Runway's output is much better and more precise than Tesco's.
The type of engine used does not seem to significantly affect Tesco's output quality.
The third task involves generating an image of 'pneumaticites Giro SC', a type of microbe.
Tesco fails to provide a satisfactory scientific representation of the microbe.
Runway's representation is much more accurate and precise.
Tesco is deemed useless despite being free, while Runway, although not free, offers better results.
The video concludes with a recommendation against using Tesco and a nod to Runway's superior performance.