Exposing Furry SCAMMERS on Etsy

Nightzy
17 Feb 202416:03

TLDRThe video exposes the issue of AI-generated art being sold as original work on Etsy within the furry fandom. It criticizes the lack of transparency from sellers who do not disclose the AI origin of the art, questioning the authenticity and value of such purchases. The creator urges viewers to support real artists and be aware of the potential legal and ethical issues surrounding AI-generated content.

Takeaways

  • 🚨 The furry fandom faces a problem with AI-generated art being sold as original works.
  • 💡 Wacom, a leading drawing tablet company, faced backlash for promoting AI art without disclosing its origin.
  • 🤖 AI art generators are criticized for their lack of creativity and for producing low-quality, error-prone images.
  • 🎨 Etsy has become a platform where AI art is sold, often without disclosure of its AI-generated nature.
  • 💸 Some AI-generated art sellers on Etsy charge high prices for their products, misleading customers.
  • 📜 Copyright and ownership issues arise with AI-generated art, as it's based on copyrighted works and may not be eligible for copyright protection.
  • 👎 The use of AI in art is seen as a threat to real artists and the value of original, handcrafted artwork.
  • 🛍️ Customers are advised to support real artists and be cautious of AI-generated art, which lacks the personal touch and effort of human-made creations.
  • 📈 The debate over AI's role in art is ongoing, with opinions varying on its ethical implications and artistic value.
  • 🌐 The community is encouraged to create a safe space for real art and artists,远离AI-generated 'heartless garbage'.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue the video addresses regarding the furry fandom and AI art?

    -The main issue is the prevalence of AI-generated art being sold as original work within the furry fandom, particularly on platforms like Etsy, without proper disclosure of its AI origin.

  • How does the video criticize Wacom's promotion featuring AI art?

    -The video criticizes Wacom for featuring AI-generated art in their promotion, despite their business model being based on artists, and points out the poor quality of the AI art, such as incorrect anatomy and background removal issues.

  • What are some red flags indicating AI-generated art according to the video?

    -Red flags include an unrealistic amount of highly detailed art available, inconsistencies in anatomy and design, and elements like tails or accessories that don't logically fit with the character's anatomy.

  • What is the significance of the reviews mentioned in the video?

    -The reviews are significant because they show that customers are often under the impression that they are purchasing original artwork when in fact they are getting AI-generated images, highlighting the misleading nature of these sales.

  • What is the video's stance on AI upscaling of images?

    -The video suggests that AI upscaling is not inherently bad, but it is problematic when it is not disclosed and used to pass off AI-generated images as original art.

  • How does the video address the ethical concerns surrounding AI art?

    -The video raises ethical concerns about AI art being based on stolen assets, as AI models are trained on other people's art without their consent, which is considered morally bankrupt.

  • What legal issues are discussed in relation to AI-generated art and copyright?

    -The video discusses how the U.S. copyright office has refused to register copyrights for AI-generated images and how these images may not be considered sufficiently produced by a human artist, questioning the legality of owning and selling such art.

  • What is the video's suggestion for supporting the furry community?

    -The video suggests supporting real artists within the furry community by purchasing original artwork and avoiding AI-generated art, thus creating a safe space for authentic creative expression.

  • How does the video address the potential for AI art to infringe on copyrighted material?

    -The video points out that AI art can sometimes include copyrighted characters without permission, highlighting the potential for copyright infringement and the profiting from unlicensed intellectual property.

  • What alternative options does the video present for those interested in supporting real art and artists?

    -The video promotes the speaker's own clothing shop, which features designs created by real artists, as an alternative way to support and appreciate original artwork within the community.

Outlines

00:00

🎨 The Issue with AI Art in the Furry Fandom

The paragraph discusses the problem of AI-generated art in the furry fandom, highlighting the lack of creativity in using sentence generators to produce random images. It criticizes Wacom, a leading drawing tablet company, for promoting non-artist imagery and questions their business model based on artists. The speaker also expresses concern about AI art scams on Etsy, where sellers use AI-generated art to deceive buyers into believing they are purchasing original works. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of supporting real artists and the negative impact of AI-generated art on the community.

05:02

💸 The Financial Aspect of AI Art Scams

This paragraph delves into the financial side of AI art scams, particularly on Etsy, where sellers charge high prices for AI-generated content without disclosing its origin. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency and the misleading nature of these sales, as buyers are led to believe they are purchasing exclusive, handcrafted art. The paragraph also discusses customer reviews, revealing that some buyers are aware of the AI aspect but still appreciate the quality, while others feel deceived. The speaker argues that AI-generated art lacks the soul and value of handcrafted works and discourages supporting such practices.

10:03

🚫 The Ethical and Legal Concerns of AI Art

The paragraph addresses the ethical and legal concerns surrounding AI art, questioning the ownership and copyright of AI-generated characters. It references a lawsuit involving the AI platform Midjourney and discusses the US copyright office's refusal to register copyrights for AI-generated images. The speaker argues that AI art is built on the work of countless artists, which is morally questionable. The paragraph also raises concerns about potential copyright infringement and the use of unlicensed intellectual property in AI-generated art. The speaker calls for a community that values and supports original art, rather than promoting AI-generated works.

15:03

🛍️ Supporting Real Artists and Authentic Art

In the final paragraph, the speaker emphasizes the importance of supporting real artists and authentic art within the furry community. They express frustration with AI-generated art infiltrating the community and overshadowing the work of talented artists. The speaker promotes their own clothing shop as a platform for authentic, artist-created designs and encourages viewers to support such initiatives. The video concludes with a call to action for the community to create a safe space for original art and to reject the heartless practice of AI art generation.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Furry fandom

The furry fandom is a subculture interested in anthropomorphic animal characters with human personalities and characteristics. In the video, the creator discusses how this community has been affected by the influx of AI-generated art, which is often sold as original work, misleading consumers and potentially undermining the value of handcrafted art within the fandom.

💡AI art

AI art refers to artwork that is created with the assistance of artificial intelligence, often through the use of machine learning models that are trained on vast datasets of human-generated art. The video script highlights the controversy surrounding AI art in the furry community, as it is sometimes sold as original art without proper disclosure, which can be considered deceptive.

💡Etsy

Etsy is an e-commerce website focused on handmade or vintage items and craft supplies. In the context of the video, Etsy is used as a platform where AI-generated art is being sold, often without clear disclosure that the art is not hand-drawn by an artist, leading to concerns about authenticity and the potential devaluation of genuine artistry.

💡Scams

Scams refer to fraudulent schemes or dishonest activities designed to deceive people, often for personal or financial gain. In the video, the term is used to describe the practice of selling AI-generated art as original work, which misleads buyers about the true nature and effort behind the creation of the art pieces.

💡Wacom

Wacom is a company known for its pen tablets and pen displays, which are widely used by artists for digital art creation. The video mentions a Wacom promotion that featured AI-generated art, highlighting the irony of a company built on the back of artists promoting art that does not involve human creativity.

💡Art generators

Art generators are software or platforms that use algorithms to create images based on user inputs, often resulting in unique and visually striking artwork. The video discusses the use of art generators in the furry community, emphasizing the concern that these tools can produce art that appears highly detailed and complex, potentially misleading those who believe it to be the work of human artists.

💡Robo render

The term 'Robo render' is used in the video to refer to an artist on Etsy who is suspected of selling AI-generated art under the guise of original creations. The name itself suggests a connection to AI or robotic processes, which is a red flag indicating that the art may not be hand-drawn by a human artist.

💡Copyright

Copyright refers to the legal rights that creators have over their original works, including the right to reproduce, distribute, and display those works. The video discusses the complexities of copyright in relation to AI-generated art, questioning whether such works can be copyrighted and who would hold the rights to them, given that they are not created by human beings.

💡Art theft

Art theft in the context of the video refers to the practice of AI models being trained on existing artworks to generate new images, which some consider a form of stealing or unethical use of artists' original creations. The video argues that AI-generated art is morally bankrupt because it is based on assets that are essentially stolen from other artists without their consent or compensation.

💡Community

In the video, the term 'community' refers to the collective group of individuals who share a common interest in the furry fandom and its associated art. The creator expresses concern that the influx of AI-generated art is negatively impacting the community's values and the support for genuine, handcrafted art.

💡Authenticity

Authenticity in the context of the video relates to the genuineness and originality of art, emphasizing the value of human-created works over those produced by AI. The creator argues for the importance of supporting real artists and maintaining a community that values authentic creativity and artistic expression.

Highlights

The furry fandom faces a problem with AI art being sold as original works.

Wacom, a leading drawing tablet company, faced backlash for promoting AI art as artist-made.

AI art generators are criticized for lack of creativity and producing low-quality images.

Etsy has become a hotbed for AI art scams, particularly targeting the furry community.

Many AI art sellers on Etsy do not disclose the AI origin of their products.

Robo render, an artist on Etsy, is suspected of selling AI-generated art.

The inconsistencies and errors in Robo render's art suggest AI generation.

Despite the low quality, some customers are still purchasing AI art, believing it to be hand-drawn.

Reviews on AI art products reveal a mix of satisfaction and suspicion among buyers.

The use of AI in art is a hotly debated topic, with ethical concerns about its origins and impact on real artists.

AI art generators are trained on the works of human artists, raising questions about theft and originality.

The US copyright office has refused to register copyrights for AI-generated images, citing human creation as a requirement.

The legality of owning AI-generated art is unclear, and it may not truly belong to the purchaser.

AI-generated art can include copyrighted material, leading to potential infringement issues.

Supporting real artists and avoiding AI-generated art is encouraged to maintain the integrity of the art community.

The video creator's clothing shop features original designs by real artists, promoting authentic art over AI-generated content.