GPT-4 VS. Gemini Ultra (The Ultimate Head to Head Comparison)
TLDRIn a comprehensive comparison, GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra, also known as Google Advan, were pitted against each other across various categories to determine the superior AI chatbot. The test involved 10 categories, including writing, research, creativity, coding, and reasoning, with each task scored out of five. GPT-4, despite limitations in usage and privacy settings, demonstrated strengths in text summarization, copywriting, and coding. Google Gemini Ultra showed potential with its multimodal capabilities and integration with Google Workspace and YouTube, but fell short in image recognition and content creation. The verdict was that GPT-4 maintained its edge, though Google's advancements show promise for future improvements.
Takeaways
- 🤖 GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra are the leading AI chatbots, with GPT-4 being the dominant one since its release.
- 🔍 The comparison is based on 10 different categories, including writing, research, creativity, coding, and reasoning.
- 🚀 Google Gemini Ultra claims to outperform GPT-4 in some benchmark tests, but a comprehensive test is needed to verify this.
- 💬 GPT-4 has limitations based on subscription plans, with individual plans being limited to 40 messages every 3 hours.
- 🔒 Privacy is a concern for both chatbots, but GPT-4's team plan offers a default setting that disables the use of conversations for model training.
- 📝 GPT-4's context window is 4,000 tokens, while Gemini Ultra's is 32,000 tokens, affecting the amount of text that can be processed in a prompt.
- 📈 Both GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra performed well in text summarization, with Gemini offering the ability to modify responses for tone and style.
- ✍️ In content creation, GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra both received four stars, with Gemini providing more natural language for email responses.
- 🔍 GPT-4 excelled in multimodal tasks, such as image recognition, while Gemini Ultra struggled with understanding uploaded images.
- 💡 Google Gemini Ultra has access to Google Workspace and YouTube, providing a significant advantage in research and content creation.
- 🏆 After a detailed comparison, GPT-4 maintained an edge over Google Gemini Ultra in most categories, despite the close competition.
Q & A
What was the main purpose of the comparison between GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra in the video?
-The main purpose was to determine which AI chatbot, GPT-4 or Google Gemini Ultra, is the best available currently by testing them across 10 different categories and assigning scores based on their performance in various tasks.
What are the limitations of GPT-4 based on the subscription plan mentioned in the video?
-The limitations include the number of chats one can have per hour, with the individual plan limited to 40 messages every 3 hours, while the teams plan, costing $30 per person per month, allows for more usage but still has limitations.
How does the video address the issue of privacy with GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra?
-The video mentions that both AI chatbots could technically use conversations to improve their models. However, the teams plan for GPT-4 has a setting to disable this by default, giving it an edge in privacy over Google Gemini Ultra, which doesn't have a simple setting shown yet.
What was the context window measurement for Google Gemini Ultra and GPT-4?
-Google Gemini Ultra has a context window of 32,000 tokens, while GPT-4 has a context window of 4,000 tokens, although GPT-4 Turbo has a 132,000 token limit.
How did GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra perform in text summarization tasks?
-Both GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra performed excellently in text summarization tasks, providing accurate and concise summaries as per the given prompts, earning them both five stars in this category.
What was the outcome of the coding test for creating a snake game in Python?
-GPT-4 provided a step-by-step guide and code that successfully created a snake game when followed, while Google Gemini Ultra's code had errors and did not work, even after following the provided steps.
How did the video evaluate the creativity of GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra?
-The video used prompts like writing a monologue from an everyday object's point of view and creating an opening scene for a story. GPT-4 outperformed Google Gemini Ultra in creativity, providing more comprehensive and well-formatted responses.
What are the extension capabilities of Google Gemini Ultra and GPT-4?
-Google Gemini Ultra has a few extensions, including one that integrates with Google Workspace and YouTube, while GPT-4 has access to custom GPTs and a GPT store with thousands of models, though the custom GPTs are still in development and not as immediately useful as Google's extensions.
How did the video compare GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra in content creation for social media?
-Both GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra were given a script from a YouTube video and asked to create a tweet. Google Gemini Ultra provided a more suitable tweet with proper length and formatting, while GPT-4's output was less effective and required additional work to be tweet-ready.
What was the overall verdict after comparing GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra across various categories?
-GPT-4 emerged as the stronger AI chatbot overall, despite a close race, due to its consistent performance across categories and established capabilities, while Google Gemini Ultra showed potential but still had areas needing improvement.
Outlines
🤖 AI Chatbot Comparison: GPT-4 vs Google Gemini Ultra
The video script begins with a comparison between GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra, two AI chatbots. The author has spent a week testing both to determine which is superior. GPT-4 has been the leading AI chatbot since its release, but Google Gemini Ultra claims to outperform it in certain benchmarks. The author plans to test both across 10 categories, including writing, research, creativity, and coding, and assigns scores based on performance in common tasks. The script also discusses limitations and privacy concerns related to the usage of these AI models.
📝 Text Summarization and Writing Capabilities
The second paragraph focuses on the text summarization and writing capabilities of the AI chatbots. The author provides a detailed prompt for summarizing an article and compares the responses from GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra. Both AIs perform well, but Gemini Ultra offers additional options for modifying the response and provides multiple drafts. The author also tests the AIs' ability to write a product description and email copy, finding that GPT-4 excels in tone and style, while Gemini Ultra provides more options and better formatting.
🌐 Multimodal Interaction and Image Processing
This paragraph discusses the multimodal capabilities of the AI chatbots, specifically their ability to interact with images. The author tests the AIs' vision capabilities by asking them to describe a frustrated person in an image and to convert a screenshot of a website into HTML and CSS code. GPT-4 demonstrates superior vision capabilities, while Gemini Ultra struggles with image recognition. The author also explores the AIs' image generation capabilities, comparing their responses to a prompt for creating a photorealistic image of a cat wearing sunglasses and skateboarding.
🔍 Research and Link Accuracy
The fourth paragraph examines the research capabilities of the AI chatbots, including their ability to provide accurate and clickable links. The author tests both AIs with a research prompt about quantum entanglement for high school students and a business-related question about AI's impact on the accounting industry. Gemini Ultra provides better formatting and clickable links, but some links lead to non-existent pages. GPT-4, on the other hand, does not provide clickable links but offers a more human-like response.
🎨 Creativity and Storytelling
In this paragraph, the author evaluates the creativity of the AI chatbots by asking them to write a monologue from the perspective of a paperclip and to create the opening scene for a story blending film noir and high fantasy. GPT-4 outperforms Gemini Ultra in storytelling, providing a more comprehensive and well-formatted story. The author also notes that GPT-4 has been a leader in creativity for a long time, while Gemini Ultra is more matter-of-fact in its responses.
💻 Coding and Problem-Solving
The fifth paragraph focuses on the coding capabilities of the AI chatbots. The author asks them to write a Python code for a snake game and evaluates their ability to provide a step-by-step guide for a non-developer. GPT-4 provides a successful and functional snake game, while Gemini Ultra's code contains errors and fails to run the game. The author also tests the AIs' problem-solving skills with a math riddle, finding that both AIs have room for improvement in complex reasoning and math accuracy.
🌟 Extensions and Functionalities
This paragraph compares the extensions and additional functionalities of GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra. The author highlights Google Gemini's integration with Google Workspace and YouTube, which provides a significant advantage. GPT-4, however, offers custom GPT models and a GPT store with thousands of options, though they are not as immediately useful as Google's extensions. The author also discusses the potential of these functionalities and their impact on the overall usefulness of the AI chatbots.
📣 Content Creation for Social Media
The final paragraph of the script discusses the AI chatbots' capabilities in content creation, specifically for social media. The author tests the AIs' ability to create a tweet from a YouTube video script. Gemini Ultra provides a more suitable tweet with proper length and formatting, while GPT-4 struggles with the character limit and formatting. The author concludes that both AIs have potential in content repurposing but require effective prompting to achieve optimal results.
🏆 Conclusion and Final Thoughts
The video script concludes with a tally of the points awarded to each AI chatbot across various categories. GPT-4 emerges as the overall leader, despite a close race. The author notes that Google Gemini Ultra has many features in beta and has potential to improve, but it is not yet on par with GPT-4. The author also mentions an e-learning platform offering AI courses and invites viewers to subscribe for a comprehensive learning experience.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡GPT-4
💡Google Gemini Ultra
💡AI Chatbot
💡Text Summarization
💡Image Generation
💡Coding
💡Complex Reasoning
💡Content Creation
💡Extensions
💡Privacy
💡Multimodality
Highlights
Introduction to the comprehensive comparison between GPT-4 and Google Gemini Ultra.
Explanation of testing methodology across 10 categories including writing, research, creativity, and coding.
Discussion on usage limitations and subscription plans for GPT-4.
Overview of privacy considerations for both AI chatbots.
Comparison of context window sizes for GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra.
Detailed analysis of text summarization capabilities.
Assessment of writing copy for marketing and email responses.
Evaluation of image recognition and HTML/CSS code generation from images.
Insights into image generation capabilities and limitations.
Research capabilities comparison, including access to real-time web data and links.
Creativity test through monologue writing and storytelling prompts.
Coding challenge with Python game examples.
Complex reasoning and mathematical problem-solving comparison.
Discussion on unique functionalities and extensions like Google Workspace and YouTube integration for Gemini.
Final verdict on the best AI chatbot based on extensive testing across multiple categories.
