Photoshop vs Luminar Neo BATTLE: Cutting Out Images
TLDRThe video transcript details a comparison between Adobe Photoshop and Luminar Neo in a cutting out images challenge. The test is divided into two stages: one-click, where the software automatically selects the subject, and refine, where manual tools are used to improve the selection. In the first stage, Photoshop is more precise with better edge definition, earning it the first point. However, Luminar Neo performs better in the second photo, winning points for both stages due to quicker and more controlled refinement. The third photo results in a win for Photoshop in both stages, leading to a final score of 4 to 2. The summary concludes that while Photoshop offers more precise selection tools and better control over edges, Luminar Neo is a strong contender, particularly for simpler subjects, and shows promise for future development with more manual control options.
Takeaways
- 🤖 **AI Cutting Out Comparison**: A challenge to determine which software, Photoshop or Luminar Neo, performs better in cutting out subjects from images using AI.
- 🔍 **Two-Stage Test**: The test is divided into a one-click stage, where the software works autonomously, and a refine stage, where manual tools are used to improve the selection.
- 🌟 **Photoshop's Edge in Stage One**: In the first stage, without additional help, Photoshop was more precise with better defined edges, earning it the first point.
- 🎨 **Luminar Neo's Refinement Struggles**: Luminar Neo had difficulty refining selections, especially in areas with similar colors, which affected its performance.
- ✂️ **Photoshop's Refinement Tools**: Photoshop provided more precise tools for refining selections, such as the polygonal lasso and select and mask panel, giving it an advantage in the second stage.
- 🚀 **Luminar Neo's Quicker Refinement**: Despite fewer controls, Luminar Neo was quicker to refine selections in some cases, earning it points for being more efficient.
- 🏆 **Photoshop's Consistent Performance**: Photoshop demonstrated a more consistent performance across different images, with better control over selection edges.
- 🤔 **Luminar Neo's AI Strengths**: Luminar Neo showed strength in handling simple objects and scenes but needs improvement in precision and manual control for complex selections.
- 📈 **Photoshop's Market Experience**: Being on the market for a longer time, Photoshop benefits from more advanced selection tools and a combination of AI and manual controls.
- 🌲 **Luminar Neo's Other AI Capabilities**: While selection tools may not be its strong suit, Luminar Neo excels in other AI tasks like sky replacements and object repairs.
- 📚 **Learning Opportunity**: The video also hints at a future tutorial on a professional trick for cutting out trees in Photoshop, addressing common selection challenges.
Q & A
Which software won the first stage of the cutout challenge in the video?
-Photoshop won the first stage as it was more precise and had better defined edges compared to Luminar Neo.
How does Luminar Neo's refinement brush work?
-The refinement brush in Luminar Neo allows you to adjust the brush size and has three tabs - transition, object and background. You can paint over areas to tell the software which parts should be included or excluded from the selection.
What are the two options for the 'Select Subject' tool in Photoshop?
-The two options for the 'Select Subject' tool in Photoshop are 'Device', which creates faster results by analyzing images locally on your machine, and 'Cloud', which is processed in the cloud and is supposed to be trained better.
Which software won the second photo challenge in the video?
-Luminar Neo won the second photo challenge as it produced a cleaner result and handled the subject's fingers better than Photoshop.
How does Photoshop's Select and Mask panel help in refining selections?
-Photoshop's Select and Mask panel provides tools like the Polygonal Lasso for making precise selections, as well as sliders for adjusting smoothness, contrast and edge shift to refine the overall selection edges.
What is the final score between Photoshop and Luminar Neo in the video?
-The final score is Photoshop 4, Luminar Neo 2. Photoshop won more points due to its better developed selection tools and the ability to combine AI with manual controls.
What are some limitations of Luminar Neo's selection tools according to the video?
-Luminar Neo's selection tools struggle with areas of similar colors and fine details like fingers. It also lacks more precise manual controls for refining selection edges compared to Photoshop.
What are some strengths of Luminar Neo mentioned in the video?
-Luminar Neo is good at simple object selections and excels at other AI-powered tasks like image repair, sky replacements etc. It also has the advantage of being a newer, AI-focused software.
How does the cloud AI version of Photoshop's 'Select Subject' perform in the video?
-The cloud AI version of Photoshop's 'Select Subject' performs very well, producing better results compared to the device option. It's able to make more precise selections.
What is the main advantage of Photoshop's selection tools over Luminar Neo's according to the video?
-The main advantage of Photoshop's selection tools is the ability to have more control over the selection edges and combine AI with manual adjustments for better precision.
What is the verdict of the video on which software is better for cutting out images?
-The video concludes that Photoshop is better for cutting out images due to its more advanced selection tools and the ability to combine AI with manual controls for precise selections.
What is the video's advice for dealing with difficult selections like trees in Photoshop?
-The video teases a future tutorial on a clever trick to cut out trees like a professional in Photoshop, making it an easier task once learned.
Outlines
🖼️ AI Cutout Challenge: Photoshop vs. Luminar Neo
This paragraph introduces a cutout challenge between two softwares, Photoshop and Luminar Neo, to determine which performs better in cutting out subjects from images. The speaker has prepared images for the test and plans to rate each software's performance in two stages: a one-click stage without manual intervention and a refine stage with manual adjustments. The first image is a Star Wars robot, and the speaker demonstrates the initial cutout process for both softwares, noting areas where each software struggles. Photoshop's cloud-based selection tool performs better in the first stage, but Luminar Neo's refinement tools prove challenging to use. The paragraph concludes with Photoshop receiving the first point for precision and edge definition.
🏂 Ski Jumper and Airplane Cutout: Refining the Selection
The second paragraph discusses the cutout challenge with a ski jumper and an airplane. Luminar Neo initially performs well with the ski jumper, but Photoshop's cloud option outperforms it in the first stage. However, Photoshop struggles with the airplane image, with both the device and cloud options failing to produce satisfactory results. The speaker then refines the selections for both images using the respective software's tools. Despite having more control options, Photoshop's refining process is more time-consuming. Luminar Neo's refinement brush is quicker but offers less control over the edges. The paragraph ends with Luminar Neo earning points for the ski jumper and airplane images, leading to a close score between the two softwares.
🛠️ Final Verdict: Photoshop's Superior Selection Tools
In the final paragraph, the speaker reflects on the overall challenge and shares their opinion on the softwares' performance. Despite Luminar Neo's strong showing with simple objects, Photoshop is deemed better developed in selection tools, offering more control over edges and a more effective combination of AI and manual controls. The speaker acknowledges Photoshop's long-standing presence in the market and its advanced capabilities. They also express hope for Luminar Neo to introduce more precise selection tools beyond AI and brushes. The paragraph concludes with a teaser for a future video on a clever trick to cut out trees in Photoshop, hinting at the ongoing challenges faced by users with complex selections.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI
💡Photoshop
💡Luminar Neo
💡Cutting Out Images
💡One-Click Stage
💡Refine Stage
💡Background Removal
💡Object Selection Tool
💡Device vs Cloud
💡Refinements Brush
💡Polygonal Lasso Tool
💡Manual Controls
Highlights
AI-powered software like Photoshop and Luminar Neo can simplify the process of cutting out subjects from images, but results are not always perfect.
Photoshop and Luminar Neo are both praised for their capabilities, but a comparison is made to determine which performs better in cutting out images.
The challenge involves two stages: a one-click stage with no manual intervention and a refine stage using tools within the software.
In the first image test, Luminar Neo initially performed well but missed some parts of the subject.
Photoshop's object selection tool with the 'device' option was faster but missed part of the subject's leg.
Photoshop's 'cloud' option for select subject provided a more detailed result, although it still missed spots on the subject.
Photoshop received the first point for being more precise and having better defined edges in the initial test.
Luminar Neo's refinements brush allows for real-time adjustments but struggles with similar colors and small areas.
Photoshop's selection and mask panel with tools like the polygonal lasso offer more precise control for refinement.
Photoshop received another point for clearer edges and more precise tools in the refinement stage.
In the second photo, Luminar Neo provided a cleaner result with fewer issues after background removal.
Photoshop's device option failed to accurately select the skier, with significant parts of the subject missing.
Photoshop's cloud option improved the selection but still missed fingers and did not remove the background cleanly.
Luminar Neo won the point for stage one of the second photo for better handling of complex areas and fingers.
Luminar Neo was quicker in the refinement stage of the second photo, earning another point.
In the third photo, Luminar Neo's initial selection was poor, and even after refinement, the results were unsatisfactory.
Photoshop's cloud version of the select subject won the point for stage one with a better initial selection.
Photoshop's manual tools provided more confidence and control during the refinement stage, earning it another point.
Overall, Photoshop is considered better for selection tools, offering more control and effective AI combined with manual controls.
Luminar Neo, despite being newer and performing well with simple objects, lacks precise selection tools and more manual control options.
The video offers a discount code for both Photoshop and Luminar Neo, encouraging viewers to try the software for themselves.
A teaser is provided for a future video that will show a trick to cut out trees professionally in Photoshop.
