Pictory AI vs Invideo - Which Is The BEST AI Video Generator?
TLDRIn a head-to-head comparison, Pictory AI and Invideo are assessed as leading AI video generators. Both platforms have undergone significant updates in 2023, with Invideo receiving a complete overhaul, aiming to become the first AI video generator akin to Chat GPT for video. It allows users to input prompts and automatically generates a complete video, including script, voice-over, and video clips. Pictory AI has chosen to remain a hybrid AI, focusing on improving the base product quality, particularly the voiceovers, in partnership with 11laabs. While Invideo offers more automation and is better suited for shorter content creation, Pictory AI provides more control over the final video appearance. Both tools are time-savers and offer a solid foundation for video creation, but neither can fully replace the need for personal touches to stand out in the competitive YouTube landscape.
Takeaways
- 🥇 Pictory and Invideo are market leaders in AI video generation, each claiming to be the best available.
- 🔍 Invideo has undergone a significant overhaul in 2023, aiming to become the first AI video generator that can create a complete video from a few prompts.
- 📜 Both tools are based on AI reading a script and matching videos to it, but Invideo has integrated chat GPT for script generation.
- 📈 Invideo's AI matches video content slightly better, likely due to its approach to clip selection providing more context for video matching.
- ⏱️ Invideo generates good videos quickly, which can be impressive but may require further editing for higher quality or longer content.
- 📉 The quality of Invideo's videos is better for short content like YouTube Shorts, whereas longer videos may need more editing.
- 🎶 Invideo's editing capabilities are currently limited, making it difficult to adjust voiceovers, music, or add annotations without AI assistance.
- 🔄 Pictory has chosen to remain a hybrid AI, focusing on improving the base product's quality, particularly the voiceovers, in partnership with 11labs.
- 📚 Pictory offers more control over the final video appearance, with features like subtitles, text annotations, and the ability to add logos and emojis.
- 📈 To stand out on YouTube, creators still need to add their own unique touches to AI-generated videos, as no tool can do it 100% automatically.
- ⏩ Both Pictory and Invideo are significant time-savers, providing a solid base for video creation, with the choice between them depending on the level of automation desired and video length.
Q & A
Which two AI video generator tools are being compared in the transcript?
-The two AI video generator tools being compared are Pictory and Invideo.
What is the primary goal of Invideo's overhaul in 2023?
-Invideo's overhaul aims to create an AI video generator that can generate a complete video from just a few prompts, including the script, voice-over, and video clips.
What is the main criticism regarding the AI's ability to match video clips to scripts?
-The main criticism is that the AI needs to improve its comprehension of the script's content and the video clips' actual content to achieve a higher match rate and reduce manual editing.
Why does the speaker believe Invideo has an edge in video content matching?
-The speaker believes Invideo has an edge because its AI decides when the clip starts and ends, providing greater context for video selection.
What is the main challenge with Invideo's editing capabilities?
-The main challenge is that it is difficult to edit the voice or music after the video is generated, and there is no way to save preferred music or voices for future use.
What type of content does the speaker find better suited for Invideo's AI video generator?
-The speaker finds short content, such as YouTube Shorts or 5-minute videos, better suited for Invideo's AI video generator due to the limitations of the AI in generating longer texts.
What is Pictory's approach to AI video generation compared to Invideo?
-Pictory has opted to remain a hybrid AI, focusing on improving the quality of the base product, such as voiceovers, and providing more control over the video's appearance.
Which company does Pictory partner with for high-quality AI voiceovers?
-Pictory partners with 11 laabs for high-quality AI voiceovers.
What additional features does Pictory offer that Invideo does not?
-Pictory offers features like adding subtitles, text annotations, logos, gifts, and emojis to the videos.
What is the speaker's overall recommendation for users who want to create videos with minimal editing?
-For users who want to create videos with minimal editing and are not too concerned about the overall quality or control, the speaker recommends Invideo.
What is the speaker's view on the necessity of adding personal touches to videos created by AI tools?
-The speaker believes that even with AI tools, users need to add their own finishing touches to stand out, as no AI tool can currently do everything 100% for you.
What advice does the speaker give for ensuring video quality in competitive YouTube niches?
-The speaker advises ensuring that videos are at least as good as the competition in the niche, and that low-quality videos will only work in low competition niches.
Outlines
🤖 AI Video Generators: Pictory vs. Invideo
The video script introduces a comparison between two leading AI video generator tools, Pictory and Invideo, focusing on their suitability for faceless YouTube content and professional YouTube automation. Both tools have undergone significant changes in 2023, with Invideo being rebranded as the 'chat GPT for video,' allowing users to input prompts and automatically generate complete videos. The script generation, voiceover, and video clips are woven together seamlessly. Pictory, on the other hand, has chosen to remain a hybrid AI, aiming to save time and money while providing more control over the final video output. The narrator also discusses the importance of improving AI's ability to match video clips to scripts for a higher match rate and the potential for future feature enhancements.
🎬 Invideo's Features and Limitations
The second paragraph delves into the specifics of Invideo's functionality, its slick interface, and the quick generation of videos. It highlights the tool's ability to produce good quality videos in a short amount of time, which has garnered praise from channels like Matt Wolf and Liam James K. However, the narrator points out the need for more than just text prompts to create viral content and the limitations when it comes to editing longer videos within Invideo. The paragraph also discusses the challenges of saving preferred voices or music for future use and the current lack of advanced editing features within the platform, suggesting that for now, Invideo is best suited for users who want minimal post-editing and are less concerned with full creative control.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Video Generator
💡YouTube Shorts
💡Explainer Videos
💡Script to Video
💡Voiceover
💡Stock Sites
💡Subtitles
💡Text Annotations
💡AI Match Rate
💡Video Editing
💡Automation
💡Quality Control
Highlights
Pictory and Invideo are both market leaders in AI video generation.
Invideo has undergone a complete overhaul to become the first AI video generator or 'Chat GPT for video'.
Invideo allows users to generate a complete video from just a few prompts.
Pictory focuses on improving the base product quality, starting with voiceovers, partnering with 11laabs for high-quality AI voices.
Both tools are based on AI reading the script and matching videos to it, with Invideo integrating script generation.
The author suggests that improving the AI's ability to match video clips to scripts is crucial for both tools.
Invideo's AI matches video content slightly better due to its control over clip start and end points.
Invideo generates good videos quickly, which is impressive, but may require more editing for longer content.
The quality of videos from Invideo is better for short content like YouTube Shorts.
Invideo is set up to be perfect from the start, which may currently limit its flexibility in editing.
Pictory offers more control over the final video appearance, with features like subtitles, text annotations, and logos.
Pictory's approach is aimed at users who want to save time and money while retaining creative control.
The author personally prefers Pictory for its balance between automation and control.
Invideo may be better for users seeking more automation and planning to create shorter videos.
Neither tool can fully replace the need for human touch in video editing to truly stand out.
High-quality videos are now the new baseline for YouTube, and both tools provide a solid foundation to build upon.
To succeed on YouTube, videos must be at least as good as the competition in the chosen niche.
Both Pictory and Invideo are significant time-savers and provide a strong base for video creation.