Pro Goes Blatant CHEATER at Lan Tournament Final Game CS:GO
TLDRIn this video, the host discusses a professional player's disqualification for cheating during the final game of a LAN tournament in CS:GO. The analysis focuses on the player's suspicious behavior during the warm-up and the match itself, highlighting moments where the player appears to use an aimbot and wallhack. The video scrutinizes specific instances, such as the player's crosshair snapping to opponents, the lack of reaction to an AWP scope, and the toggling of cheats during gameplay. The host expresses sympathy for the player's teammates and astonishment at the player's audacity and the tournament's delayed response to the cheating. The summary concludes with the player's eventual ban and the host's anticipation of sharing more details from a previous match where the cheat detection system did not initially flag the player.
Takeaways
- 🎮 A professional player was disqualified for cheating at a LAN tournament, which was discussed in a previous video.
- 👀 The video focuses on the last game played by Optic India, where a player named Forsaken was banned for suspicious activities.
- 🤔 During the warm-up, Forsaken seems to be adjusting settings, which is a common practice, but his performance raises suspicions.
- 🚫 It is suggested that Forsaken may have been using an aimbot with a name lock feature, which is a form of cheating.
- 👀 The video points out that cheating at a LAN tournament is risky due to the presence of coaches and the potential for others to see the player's screen.
- 🔍 The analysis includes a close look at specific gameplay moments where Forsaken's actions appear to be indicative of cheating.
- 😅 There are instances where the aimbot seems to misfire, possibly due to recoil correction or other in-game mechanics.
- 🤨 The video also discusses the difficulty of distinguishing between a cheater and a highly skilled player in certain situations.
- 👂 Forsaken's lack of reaction to certain in-game sounds, like the scope of an AWP, is highlighted as unusual for a top-tier player.
- 🤔 The video speculates on the possibility of Forsaken having a second key to toggle the aimbot on and off during gameplay.
- 😲 The most blatant moment of cheating is shown, where Forsaken appears to lock onto an opponent's head and follow them through a box.
- 🛑 After a timeout is called, the inevitable outcome of the investigation into cheating is alluded to, though not detailed in the script.
Q & A
What was the reason for the pro player's disqualification at the LAN tournament?
-The pro player was disqualified for cheating during the tournament's final game of CS:GO.
Why do players adjust settings during the warm-up phase?
-Players adjust settings during the warm-up to ensure their setup is as close to perfect as possible, as there can be variations from computer to computer.
What is the term used to describe the player's suspicious behavior in the warm-up?
-The term used is 'snapping to people's faces,' which suggests the use of an aimbot or similar cheating software.
What did the player claim to be using when questioned by his teammates?
-The player claimed to be using only a trigger bot when questioned by his teammates.
Why is wall hacking considered difficult to get away with at a LAN tournament?
-Wall hacking is difficult to hide at a LAN tournament due to the close proximity of other players and coaches, as well as the potential for cameramen to see the screen.
What happened during the pistol round that raised suspicion?
-During the pistol round, the player's crosshair abnormally snapped to the ground after being shot at, which could indicate an auto-correct feature of an aimbot.
What was the player's strategy during the aggressive play at the A site?
-The player used flashes from his teammates to peek and take shots, which could be consistent with top-level play but also raised suspicions due to aim lock on a player's head.
How did the player's reaction to the AWP scope sound affect the analysis?
-The player did not seem to react to the sound of the AWP scope, which is unusual for a top player and raised further suspicions about potential cheating.
What was the most blatant moment of cheating observed in the game?
-The most blatant moment was when the player locked onto an opponent's back and followed him through the box without moving his crosshair, indicating a clear aim lock.
What was the player's behavior like during the eco round?
-During the eco round, the player did not have to do much as the opposing team entered the A site, and he managed to finish off the last two kills with some effective sprays.
What was the final outcome of the match and the player's reaction?
-The team lost the round and the first half of the game. The player's actions, including some suspicious aiming behavior, led to a ban for cheating.
Why was the player's behavior during the game surprising?
-The player's behavior was surprising because he was able to cheat blatantly without being caught immediately, and the cheat client allowed him to cheat multiple times before his computer was checked.
Outlines
🕵️♂️ Analyzing Optic India's Last Game and Cheating Allegations
This paragraph discusses a professional player's disqualification due to cheating at a LAN tournament. The focus is on Optic India's final game where a player named forsaken was banned. The video script describes the warm-up phase, where players adjust their settings, and raises suspicions about forsaken's performance. It highlights his exceptional aim during the warm-up, which declines as he continues to tweak settings. The suspicion is that he may have been using an aimbot with adjustable settings, which is difficult to conceal in a LAN environment, especially with coaches and others around. The paragraph also describes specific instances of gameplay that seemed to involve cheating, such as aim locking and other unnatural movements.
🎮 Close Examination of Forsaken's In-Game Behavior
The second paragraph delves deeper into the gameplay of the player forsaken, noting missed reactions to audible cues and instances of apparent aim locking. It discusses how blatant the cheating seemed, especially when forsaken locked onto an opponent's head but failed to secure a kill. The summary also mentions the challenges of detecting such cheating in a noisy tournament environment and the frustration with the game developer, Valve, for not catching the cheating sooner. It describes a round where forsaken's team took an aggressive stance, and despite some questionable moments, the actions could be attributed to a top-level player. The paragraph ends with speculation about the player's thought process regarding when to toggle on cheats and the difficulty of detecting such behavior.
🏆 Final Moments and Tournament Outcome
The final paragraph summarizes the remaining moments of the game, highlighting forsaken's continued suspicious behavior, including locking onto opponents and the use of an aimbot or anti-recoil script. It discusses the close nature of the game despite some rounds won by the terrorist side. The narrative includes a moment where forsaken is down a man and has to attempt to take the B site, showcasing more questionable gameplay. The paragraph concludes with the aftermath of a timeout being called and the player's eventual ban for cheating. It expresses surprise at the player's audacity and the length of time it took for the cheating to be detected, even after suspicious activity was observed in previous games.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Cheating
💡LAN Tournament
💡Aimbot
💡Warm-up
💡Trigger Bot
💡Wall Hacking
💡Coach
💡Pistol Round
💡Aim Lock
💡Eco Round
💡Recoil
Highlights
A professional player was disqualified for cheating at a LAN tournament in CS:GO.
The player in question, forsaken, was banned during the last game of Optic India.
Shady activities were observed during the warm-up phase, with the player adjusting settings.
The player's performance seemed to deteriorate as he continued to adjust his setup.
There was suspicion of the player using both a trigger bot and a name lock aimbot.
The difficulty of getting away with wall hacking at a LAN tournament is discussed.
The player's coach was seated behind him, which could have deterred cheating.
An unusual crosshair movement was observed during the pistol round.
The player's aim seemed to auto-correct for recoil in a suspicious manner.
Forsaken's performance over the A site raised suspicions of cheating.
There was an apparent aim lock to a player's head that did not result in a kill.
The player's reaction to an AWP scope was considered uncharacteristic of a top player.
A blatant moment of locking onto a player's back was captured.
The player's aggressive positioning and subsequent actions were scrutinized.
The player's performance in an eco round was questioned, with suspicions of an aimbot or anti-recoil script.
The player's actions in a save round were analyzed, with possible toggling of cheat features suspected.
The player's final game at the tournament ended with his team in economic trouble.
The player's detection as a cheater was delayed, raising questions about the anti-cheat system's effectiveness.
