Suno, Udio (and other music AI). We're F*ED and it's really BAD. Seriously.
TLDRIn this passionate video, the speaker, Paul, addresses the alarming impact of AI-generated music on the music industry. He argues that AI music platforms like Sunno AI, which can produce high-quality music at an incredibly low cost, are threatening the livelihood of human musicians and composers. Paul predicts that within a year, the stock music market will be obsolete as AI can outperform human creators in speed and cost. He raises concerns about the legality of AI's use of copyrighted material and the potential loss of human creativity and emotion in music. Despite his apprehensions, Paul remains committed to creating music and engaging with his audience, emphasizing the irreplaceable human experience in art.
Takeaways
- 🎵 The impact of AI on music creation is becoming more significant, potentially leading to the decline of human-created stock music.
- 🚀 AI music platforms like Sunno AI are capable of generating high volumes of music at a very low cost, which could disrupt the music industry.
- 🤖 AI's ability to learn and reproduce music styles raises concerns about the future of music creators and the potential loss of their livelihoods.
- 📉 The rapid and inexpensive production of AI-generated music could make human commercial music creators obsolete.
- 📝 There are ethical and legal questions surrounding AI's use of copyrighted material and whether it constitutes plagiarism or theft.
- 🌐 The expansion of AI in the economy and social life may lead to a transformation that some find deeply inhuman and unjust.
- 😔 Musicians and artists may feel helpless against the technological shift, as they lack the collective bargaining power of larger workforces like miners or farmers.
- 💰 Corporations and businesses may prioritize the cost-effectiveness and speed of AI-generated content over the value of human creativity.
- 🤔 The speaker questions how AI learns specific music styles and the implications this has for the future of music composition.
- 👀 There is a call for awareness and potential action regarding the consequences of AI on the music industry and the artists who depend on it.
- 🌟 Despite the challenges, the human experience and passion for music creation will continue to thrive, and cannot be fully replaced by AI.
Q & A
What is the main concern expressed by the speaker about AI music?
-The speaker is concerned that AI music, particularly services like Sunno AI, is capable of generating music at a fraction of the cost and time it takes human musicians, which could lead to the displacement of human music creators in the stock and commercial music sectors.
What does the speaker believe will happen to stock music in the near future due to AI?
-The speaker believes that within a year, human-written stock music will be obsolete, as AI can produce music at a much faster rate and lower cost, making it difficult for human composers to compete.
How does the speaker describe the quality of music generated by Sunno AI?
-The speaker describes the music generated by Sunno AI as 'scary good,' noting that while sometimes the lyrics can be silly, there are instances where the output is impressively creative, impactful, funky, and groovy.
What is the speaker's stance on the legality and ethics of AI music generation?
-The speaker questions the legality and ethics of AI music generation, particularly regarding copyright issues, as AI systems require a large amount of material to learn from, which may involve copyrighted works.
What does the speaker suggest will be the impact of AI on professional music creators?
-The speaker suggests that professional music creators, especially those in the stock and commercial music sectors, will be significantly impacted, potentially leading to a loss of livelihood as AI can produce music more quickly and cheaply.
How does the speaker compare the situation of music creators to other professions that face exploitation?
-The speaker compares music creators to miners, farmers, and doctors, noting that unlike these professions, artists do not have the same leverage or ability to organize and fight against exploitation, as their work is not considered as 'necessary' by society.
What does the speaker think about the future of human music creation?
-Despite the challenges posed by AI, the speaker remains optimistic about the future of human music creation, emphasizing the irreplaceable human experience and passion that goes into creating music.
What is the speaker's opinion on the role of AI in the economy and social life?
-The speaker views the expanding role of AI in the economy and social life with apprehension, fearing that it will lead to a deeply inhuman and unjust society, particularly for creative professionals like musicians.
How does the speaker feel about the potential extinction of human-written stock music?
-The speaker feels terrified and strongly against the potential extinction of human-written stock music, viewing it as a form of theft and exploitation of human creativity and effort.
What does the speaker suggest as an alternative for musicians affected by AI music generation?
-The speaker suggests that musicians may need to find new ways to earn money outside the music world, as AI-generated music could dominate the market, leaving little room for human composers.
How does the speaker describe the experience of using Sunno AI to generate music?
-The speaker describes the experience as both astonishing and unsettling, noting how easily and quickly the AI can generate music based on simple prompts, which could potentially disrupt the music industry.
What is the speaker's view on the potential societal changes due to AI music generation?
-The speaker is deeply concerned about the societal changes that could result from AI music generation, fearing it could lead to a loss of human creativity, exploitation of artists, and a shift towards a more inhuman and unjust society.
Outlines
😔 AI's Impact on Music Creation
The speaker, Paul, expresses concern over AI's ability to replicate and commoditize music, potentially rendering human composers obsolete. He discusses the rapid advancement of AI in music generation and its implications for professional musicians, emphasizing the threat to stock music creators. Paul also shares his personal experience with Sunno AI, a platform that generates music at an incredibly low cost, and questions the legality and ethics of AI-generated content.
😲 AI's Capability to Generate Music
Paul demonstrates the ease with which Sunno AI can generate music based on simple prompts, including corporate music and a fast dubstep track. He marvels at the quality of the lyrics and the adaptability of the AI, which can create songs in various styles, including those reminiscent of well-known bands. The segment also addresses the potential future of AI in music, suggesting that it could significantly disrupt the industry.
😤 The Future of Commercial Music in the Face of AI
The speaker laments the future of commercial music creators, who may struggle to compete with AI's efficiency and cost-effectiveness. He argues that businesses and institutions will prioritize results over the human element of music creation, leading to a decline in demand for human-made commercial music. Paul also touches on the legal and ethical considerations surrounding AI and copyright, questioning how AI learns to mimic various styles.
😨 The Ethical and Legal Dilemmas of AI in Music
Paul discusses the potential legal issues with AI-generated music, particularly concerning copyright and the originality of the content produced. He expresses his fear that AI's ability to learn and reproduce styles of music could lead to the loss of jobs for music creators. The speaker also mentions Noam Chomsky's view on generative AI as a form of plagiarism and theft, and aligns with this perspective, foreseeing a bleak future for human music creators.
😠 The Injustice of AI in Music and the Lack of Outcry
The speaker feels that the music industry is being robbed by AI, which can reproduce music faster and cheaper than human composers. He expresses frustration at the lack of public outcry, comparing the situation to environmental destruction by oil companies. Paul argues that tech companies are harvesting human creativity and selling it back at a fraction of the original cost, leading to a loss of livelihood for many musicians.
😞 The Inevitability of Change and the Human Spirit
Despite his opposition to the impact of AI on music, Paul acknowledges the need to adapt. He distinguishes between creating music out of passion and making a living from it, suggesting that professional musicians will need to find new ways to earn money as AI takes over. The speaker also emphasizes that, regardless of AI's advancements, the human experience and emotional connection to music cannot be replaced, and he remains committed to creating and discussing music.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Music
💡Stock Music
💡Suno AI
💡Music Creators
💡Neural Networks
💡Copyright
💡Commercial Music
💡Musical Quality
💡Artistic Expression
💡Economic Impact
💡Human Passion
Highlights
AI music generation is becoming increasingly skillful, posing a significant threat to human music creators.
The speaker predicts that within a year, human investment in stock music will be obsolete due to AI capabilities.
AI music platforms like Sunno AI are offering services that generate hundreds of songs for a minimal cost, making them highly competitive with human composers.
The lyrics generated by Sunno AI are sometimes surprisingly good, occasionally exceeding expectations.
AI's ability to mimic various music styles, including complex ones like trip-hop, raises questions about the future of music composition.
The rapid generation of music by AI systems could lead to a loss of jobs for professional music creators.
The ethical and legal implications of AI music generation are questioned, particularly regarding copyright and originality.
AI music generation is compared to the exploitation of natural resources, highlighting its potential negative impact on society.
The speaker expresses concern that AI-generated music could lead to a loss of human creativity and the devaluation of artistic work.
AI's role in music creation is criticized for potentially undermining the emotional and intellectual investment of human artists.
The impact of AI on the music industry is likened to theft, with AI 'stealing' human creativity and reproducing it more efficiently.
The speaker suggests that only a small percentage of top artists and those who can leverage AI may survive in the changing music landscape.
AI-generated music is seen as a threat to the authenticity and emotional depth of human-created music.
The potential extinction of human-written stock music is predicted, with AI systems offering faster and cheaper alternatives.
The speaker emphasizes the irreplaceable value of human-to-human connection in music creation, which AI cannot replicate.
Despite the challenges posed by AI, the speaker remains passionate about music and committed to supporting human creativity.