Tesla FSD 12.3.4 - First Impressions
TLDRIn this video, the reviewer discusses the first impressions of Tesla's FSD version 12.3.4, focusing on improvements and potential issues. They highlight the car's handling of curves, speeds, and lane selection, noting a more pronounced visualization of curves and a generally good performance on winding roads. However, they also point out some close calls and a lack of consistency in decision-making, which could impact overall safety and comfort. The reviewer gives high scores for comfort and confidence but slightly lower for decision-making and safety due to these inconsistencies.
Takeaways
- 🚗 The video discusses the first impressions of Tesla's FSD (Full Self-Driving) version 12.3.4, focusing on potential regressions and improvements.
- 🔍 The reviewer is particularly interested in the car's handling of curves, speeds, and lane selection, as well as any lingering issues from previous versions.
- 📊 The initial observation is that curves seem more pronounced and crisp in the visualization, which could indicate improvements in the system's mapping and navigation.
- 🚀 Despite some concerns, the first test drive is successful, with the car navigating a challenging route without significant issues.
- 🌐 Auto offset functionality has shown improvement, performing well during the test and providing a more comfortable driving experience.
- 📉 The car's proximity to curves is generally good, but there are moments where it feels too close for the reviewer's comfort, indicating room for improvement.
- 🚦 The FSD's ability to handle an unprotected left turn is commendable, showcasing its capability to make complex driving maneuvers safely.
- 🚧 The reviewer notes that the FSD's decision-making can be unpredictable at times, which is essential for ensuring consistent and safe driving behavior.
- 📈 The overall driving experience is described as smooth and confidence-inspiring, with the FSD demonstrating competence in various driving scenarios.
- 📌 The reviewer assigns scores to different aspects of the FSD's performance, with high marks for comfort and confidence but a slightly lower score for decision-making due to observed inconsistencies.
- 🔄 The importance of consistency and predictability in the FSD's behavior is emphasized as key to building trust and ensuring mass adoption of the technology.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the Tesla FSD 12.3.4 update review in the video?
-The main focus of the Tesla FSD 12.3.4 update review is to look for any regressions, improvements in the proximity to curves and speeds, and overall progress in lane selection and decision-making capabilities.
What is the first observation the reviewer made about the FSD 12.3.4 update?
-The first observation the reviewer made is that the curves seem to be more pronounced and crisp in the visualization, which could potentially indicate an improvement in handling turns and navigating road bends.
How does the reviewer describe the performance of the FSD 12.3.4 in terms of handling potholes and manhole covers?
-The reviewer states that the FSD 12.3.4 successfully identifies and avoids potholes and manhole covers, indicating an improvement in obstacle detection and avoidance.
What is the reviewer's opinion on the Auto offset feature in the FSD 12.3.4 update?
-The reviewer is pleased with the Auto offset feature in the FSD 12.3.4 update, noting that it has improved significantly since its initial rollout and is performing well in maintaining the correct distance from other vehicles.
How does the reviewer evaluate the FSD's lane staging and decision-making capabilities?
-The reviewer finds the FSD's lane staging and decision-making capabilities to be generally good, but notes some inconsistencies and unpredictability, such as getting too close to other vehicles or not staging lanes as expected, which could affect overall safety and comfort.
What are the key metrics the reviewer is looking for in the FSD's performance?
-The key metrics the reviewer is looking for are consistency and predictability in the FSD's behavior, a comfortable and humanlike ride, and the ability to perform the same actions competently and repeatedly.
What score does the reviewer give for comfort level in the FSD 12.3.4 drive?
-The reviewer gives a comfort level score of nine out of ten for the FSD 12.3.4 drive, indicating a high level of comfort despite some minor issues with proximity.
What score does the reviewer give for the FSD's decision-making in the 12.3.4 update?
-The reviewer gives a decision-making score of eight out of ten for the FSD 12.3.4 update, noting that while it made some unexpected decisions, they were still within the realm of safe driving behavior.
What score does the reviewer give for safety in the FSD 12.3.4 update?
-The reviewer gives a safety score of eight out of ten for the FSD 12.3.4 update, acknowledging that there were instances where the car got too close to certain objects, leaving little room for reaction.
How does the reviewer describe the overall performance of the FSD 12.3.4?
-The reviewer describes the overall performance of the FSD 12.3.4 as very smooth, competent, and confidence-inspiring, with no major regressions and comparable to previous version 12 tests.
What unexpected behavior did the reviewer notice in the FSD 12.3.4 update?
-The reviewer noticed that the FSD 12.3.4 unexpectedly turned instead of pulling over to the side of the road, which was not the behavior observed in previous tests, indicating a change in decision-making or learning from the reviewer's usual actions.
Outlines
🚗 FSD 1.2.34 Regression Test and Curve Proximity
The video begins with the host welcoming viewers back to the channel and expressing gratitude for their continued support. The primary focus of the video is to examine the FSD 1.2.34 software update for any regressions and to assess the progress made in terms of vehicle proximity to curves and speeds. The host highlights the importance of testing lane selection and the avoidance of lingering issues. The first observation is that curves appear more pronounced and crisp in the visualization, which could indicate an improvement. The host discusses a successful first turn and the effectiveness of the auto offset feature. The video also covers the car's performance on winding roads, the handling of an unprotected left turn, and the car's decision-making process in various traffic scenarios. The host emphasizes the need for consistency and predictability in FSD behavior for mass adoption, while also sharing personal comfort levels with the car's proximity to objects and other vehicles.
🚦 Lane Change and Decision-Making Assessment
In this paragraph, the host continues the analysis of FSD 1.2.34 by focusing on the car's lane changing behavior and decision-making process. The host notes the car's appropriate use of turn signals when changing lanes and its ability to stage lanes effectively. However, a deviation from the typical behavior is observed, which introduces a slight unpredictability. The host praises the car's smooth and competent performance, inspiring confidence despite the minor issues with proximity. The video also discusses the car's handling of a final turn and its reaction to a red car turning left. The host provides scores for comfort, confidence, and decision-making, noting a slight decrease in decision-making due to the car's unpredictability in certain scenarios. The host invites viewers to share their thoughts and scores based on the observations made during the test drive.
📝 Viewer Engagement and Conclusion
The final paragraph of the script wraps up the video with a call to action for viewer engagement. The host encourages viewers to share their thoughts and scores in the comments section, reflecting on the FSD 1.2.34 test drive and the observed performance. The host expresses satisfaction with the scores achieved, highlighting that there were no major regressions and that the car's performance was still comparable to previous versions. The video concludes with the host wishing viewers a good day and reminding them to enjoy their Tesla experience.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡FSD
💡Regressions
💡Proximity to curves
💡Lane selection
💡Auto offset
💡Unprotected left turn
💡Consistency
💡Predictability
💡Curb incidence
💡Safety
💡Decision-making
Highlights
Review of Tesla FSD 12.3.4 focusing on potential regressions and improvements.
The update is being assessed for its handling of proximity to curves and speeds, as well as lane selection.
Curves appear more pronounced and crisp in the visualization, which could indicate improvements.
The first test involves navigating a challenging area known as the 'creep wall', demonstrating successful maneuvering.
Auto offset feature has shown improvement and is performing well in the test.
The FSD's approach to a curve at 11 miles per hour shows good judgment and proximity.
The car's ability to navigate around cones without visualizing them is a positive outcome.
The FSD's handling of an unprotected left turn showcases its capability to make safe decisions.
The car's proximity to other vehicles in the lane is noted to be a bit too close for comfort.
The FSD's decision-making, while generally good, shows slight unpredictability in certain situations.
The overall drive is smooth and competent, inspiring confidence despite minor issues.
The FSD's reaction to a car backing up and giving too little room is handled well.
The car's navigation around a turn without curb incidence indicates progress in that area.
The FSD's decision to turn at a certain point seems to be learning from the driver's usual actions.
The evaluation concludes with scores of 9 for comfort, 9 for confidence, and 8 for decision-making and safety.
The test driver emphasizes the importance of consistency and predictability for FSD's success.
The video invites viewers to score the FSD 12.3.4 based on the test and their own experiences.
