The Best Free AI Art Generators - RANKED Worst-Best (Most Are New to You)

AI Revolution
7 Mar 202407:04

TLDRThe video script discusses the evolution of AI art generators, highlighting their ability to create unique pieces of art. It addresses the debate around the artistic value and originality of AI-generated images and the legal challenges faced by companies like Shutterstock and Adobe. The script provides a ranking of various AI art and video generators, from basic models like Model Scope and Deep AI to more advanced systems like Stable Diffusion and Microsoft Designer, discussing their features, limitations, and potential uses.

Takeaways

  • 🎨 AI art generators have significantly advanced, now creating unique and fascinating pieces of art.
  • 🔍 AI-generated images raise questions about artistic value, ownership, and originality due to the lack of direct human intent in their creation.
  • 💡 Some communities criticize AI-generated images, advocating for more authentic, human-made content.
  • 🏢 Companies like Shutterstock and Adobe have developed AI image generators using their owned images to avoid copyright infringement issues.
  • ⚖️ Getty Images has an AI art generator and is involved in legal disputes over copyright concerns with Stability AI's stable diffusion.
  • 📸 Most AI art generators offer a few free tokens for initial use but require payment for additional images or higher quality.
  • 🎥 AI video generators like OpenAI's Sora model and D3 are notable, though access may be restricted.
  • 🤖 A range of AI art generators were tested using esoteric prompts and a photo of a Greyhound named Skip for systems requiring a photo prompt.
  • 📊 The AI art and video generators were ranked from least to most impressive based on their capabilities and output quality.
  • 💰 Some AI art generators, such as Hot Pot AI and Runway mm, offer basic services but require payment for advanced features or more uses.
  • 🌐 The landscape of AI art generators is diverse, with some focusing on high-quality outputs, like Microsoft's Designer and Leonardo AI, while others prioritize accessibility and ease of use.

Q & A

  • How have AI art generators evolved over time?

    -AI art generators have evolved from simply piecing together images found on the internet to creating unique and fascinating pieces of art, showcasing advancements in AI technology.

  • What are some concerns regarding AI-generated art?

    -Concerns include the lack of direct human intent behind the creation, which raises questions about the ownership and originality of such art.

  • How do communities react to AI-generated images?

    -Many communities criticize the use of AI-generated images, advocating for more authentic and human-made content.

  • What legal issues are companies like Shutterstock and Adobe trying to avoid with their AI image generators?

    -These companies focus on using images they own to train their AI, thus avoiding legal issues related to copyright infringement.

  • What is the current status of AI video generators in the market?

    -AI video generators like Open AI's Sora model and D3 are available, but access may be restricted, and the technology still has a long way to go in terms of quality and practicality.

  • How does the AI art generator 'Deep AI' differ from 'Dream Studio'?

    -Deep AI is a basic generator producing collage-like images, while Dream Studio offers more options for image creation but may produce derivative images unless specific prompts are given.

  • What are some limitations of the 'Stable Diffusion' image generator?

    -While versatile, Stable Diffusion faces ethical concerns for emulating living artists' styles and may require specific instructions to produce high-quality images.

  • What features does 'Microsoft Designer' offer with its AI image generator?

    -Microsoft Designer benefits from Microsoft's partnership with Open AI, offering 99 free prompts per day with the D3 model, despite having a watermark.

  • How does 'Leonardo AI' stand out among other AI art generators?

    -Leonardo AI provides stunning and highly stylized images with extensive options for creation, though using more settings and upscaling requires tokens.

  • What was the general consensus on 'NightCafe' in the AI art generator evaluation?

    -NightCafe was considered to offer various styles but quickly prompts users to pay for continued use or higher quality, with a limited free version in terms of resolution and creativity.

  • What is the main takeaway from the AI art generator landscape mentioned in the script?

    -The landscape is diverse, with generators ranging from basic collage creators to more sophisticated models, but many still have limitations and are best used for personal enjoyment due to legal and ethical considerations.

Outlines

00:00

🎨 Evolution and Controversy in AI Art Generation

This paragraph discusses the progression of AI art generators from simple image拼接 to creating unique pieces of art. It highlights the debate around the artistic value of AI-generated images due to the lack of direct human intent, and the resulting questions about ownership and originality. The paragraph also touches on the criticism from communities advocating for authentic human-made content and the legal issues surrounding AI art, with examples of companies like Shutterstock, Adobe, and Getty Images navigating these waters.

05:02

📊 Rankings and Insights on AI Art and Video Generators

The second paragraph provides a detailed rundown of various AI art and video generators, ranked from least to most impressive. It covers the features, limitations, and pricing models of different generators, including Model Scope, Zeroscope, Runway text to video, Pixr, Deep AI, Cryon, Shutterstock AI image generator, Hot Pot AI, Runway mm, Dream Studio, Stable Diffusion, VQ Gan plus clip, Wombo Dream, NightCafe, Doll E2, Google Image FX, Adobe Firefly, Stable Diffusion XL, Image Creator from Microsoft, and Leonardo AI. It also mentions Mid Journey and its impact on the AI art generator space.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI art generators

AI art generators refer to software tools that utilize artificial intelligence to create unique pieces of visual art. These tools have evolved significantly, moving from mere collages of internet images to producing more sophisticated and original works. In the context of the video, AI art generators are the central theme, with various platforms being evaluated for their capabilities in producing art and video content.

💡Artistic value

Artistic value pertains to the aesthetic, emotional, and cultural significance that a piece of art holds. It is often associated with the intent, creativity, and skill of the artist. In the video, the concept is used to question whether AI-generated images possess the same depth and worth as human-created art, given that AI lacks the personal intent behind the creation.

💡Ownership

Ownership refers to the legal rights and control over the use, distribution, and commercialization of creative works, such as art. In the context of AI-generated art, the video discusses the complexities of determining ownership due to the lack of a human creator, which can lead to legal disputes and copyright issues.

💡Authenticity

Authenticity in art refers to the genuineness and originality of a creative work, often associated with the personal touch and unique expression of the artist. The video script emphasizes the criticism from communities that prefer authentic, human-made content over AI-generated images, which may lack the personal intent and emotional depth of traditional art.

💡AI video generators

AI video generators are tools that use artificial intelligence to create short video clips from text or image inputs. These generators have been developed to expand beyond static images into dynamic video content, offering new possibilities for creative expression but also presenting challenges in terms of quality and practicality.

💡Legal issues

Legal issues in the context of AI-generated art pertain to the challenges of copyright law and intellectual property rights when it comes to works created by artificial intelligence. The video script touches on the complexities of these issues, as AI-generated content may not fit neatly into existing legal frameworks, leading to disputes over ownership and the use of copyrighted materials.

💡Personal enjoyment

Personal enjoyment refers to the individual's pleasure or satisfaction derived from an activity or experience. In the context of the video, it suggests that AI-generated art, while potentially facing criticism and legal complexities, can still be valued for personal use and enjoyment without the need for commercial or public validation.

💡Text-to-video AI generation

Text-to-video AI generation is a technology that converts textual descriptions into visual video content. This process involves interpreting the text input and generating corresponding video sequences, which can be a challenging task due to the need for understanding context, generating dynamic visuals, and ensuring coherence between the text and the resulting video.

💡Generative adversarial networks (GANs)

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a type of artificial intelligence model used in unsupervised learning, where two neural networks compete with each other to produce new data that is similar to a training set. In the context of the video, GANs are mentioned as a technology behind some AI art generators, which can result in low-resolution or unclear images depending on the sophistication of the GAN model used.

💡Ethical concerns

Ethical concerns refer to the moral implications and potential harm that can arise from certain actions or technologies. In the context of AI-generated art, the video raises ethical concerns about the emulation of living artists' styles by AI, which could lead to questions about artistic integrity, authorship, and the potential devaluation of human creativity.

💡Subscription model

A subscription model is a business approach where customers pay a recurring fee to access a product or service. In the context of AI art generators, the video discusses the transition of some platforms to a subscription-based model, where users are offered a limited number of free uses before being required to pay for continued or expanded access.

Highlights

AI art generators have evolved significantly, now capable of creating unique and fascinating pieces of art.

AI-generated images may lack the same artistic value as human-made art due to the absence of direct human intent.

Questions about ownership and originality of AI-generated art have been raised within artistic communities.

Companies like Shutterstock and Adobe have developed AI image generators using their own images to avoid copyright issues.

Getty Images has an AI art generator and is involved in legal action against Stability AI over copyright concerns.

AI video generators like OpenAI's Sora model and D3 are notable, though access may be restricted.

Tests were conducted on AI art generators using esoteric prompts and a photo of a young Greyhound named Skip.

A rundown of AI art and video generators is provided, ranked from least to most impressive.

Model Scope creates short, often distorted videos with watermarks, marking an early stage in text-to-video AI generation.

Zeroscope improves upon Model Scope by producing higher quality videos, though it can be slow and unpredictable.

Runway text-to-video offers longer video generation but still lacks in overall quality.

Pixr uses an older algorithm resulting in low-resolution, confusing images with slow processing.

Deep AI produces basic, collage-like images but lacks advanced features of newer systems.

Cryon (formerly Dolly Mini) is straightforward but requires payment for high-resolution images without watermarks.

Shutterstock AI image generator collaborates with DE Creator OpenAI, offering better quality images but not free beyond initial uses.

Hot Pot AI provides basic AI art generation and charges for additional features like object and background removal.

Runway mm contributed to stable diffusion's development, offering quality text-to-image services with limitations on free usage.

Dream Studio by Stability AI offers various image creation options but often produces derivative images without specific prompts.

Stable Diffusion is a free, open-source image generator that excels at emulating specific artists, though it has ethical concerns.

VQ Gan plus CLIP is easy to use and open, showing the image development process and producing unique outcomes.

Wombo Dream initially captivating, now less interesting with styles mostly behind a paywall, offering limited free creativity.

Nine Star AI's images have become less interesting and generic, offering daily credits for free image generation with limitations.

Deep Dream generator by Google transforms photos into art but often feels like advanced filters rather than new creations.

NightCafe offers various styles but quickly prompts users to pay for continued use or higher quality.

Doll E2 is anticipated for its detailed prompt interpretation, often defaulting to an impressionistic style but struggles with accurate face replication.

Google Image FX allows unlimited creations without a credit system, though its prompts are somewhat restrictive.

Adobe Firefly provides 25 free credits monthly, using Adobe stock images for training, resulting in basic but ad-friendly outputs.

Stable Diffusion XL attempts to offer high-quality images but struggles with details in faces and hands without specific instructions.

Microsoft's Image Creator benefits from OpenAI partnership, offering 99 free prompts per day with the D3 model, one of the most capable free tools.

Leonardo AI provides stunning, highly stylized images with extensive creation options, though upscaling costs tokens.

Mid Journey, though not free anymore, is mentioned for its high-quality outputs and influence in the AI art generator space.