There's one piece of evidence that will make that Manhattan jury convict Trump in a New York minute
TLDRThe article discusses the upcoming criminal trial of former President Donald Trump in New York, starting April 15th, where he faces charges related to hush money payments. The trial's commencement is notable given Trump's multiple failed attempts to delay it, despite claims of prejudicial media coverage. The article highlights a critical piece of evidence from the indictment: Trump allegedly instructed his lawyer to delay payments to Stormy Daniels until after the election, suggesting the payments' true purpose was not to protect Melania's feelings, as claimed, but to avoid negative campaign impact. This evidence, the author believes, will significantly harm Trump's image in the courtroom and likely lead to a swift conviction.
Takeaways
- ๐จ Donald Trump's trial is set to begin on April 15th in a New York courtroom, following a series of failed attempts to delay the proceedings.
- โ๏ธ Judge Juan Maram rejected Trump's last-ditch effort to postpone the hush money trial, citing that the defense's argument of prejudicial publicity was not tenable.
- ๐ค The Manhattan District Attorney's office argued that the jury pool has not been irreparably tainted by publicity and that impartial jurors could be selected from over a million people in Manhattan.
- ๐ฐ The defense's claim that the case should be postponed indefinitely due to ongoing media coverage was not accepted by the judge.
- ๐ค The judge questioned Trump's position that his case is unique and that pre-trial publicity will never subside, stating that this view does not align with reality.
- ๐๏ธ The trial is likened to a popularity contest, where likability and trustworthiness of all parties involved, including the defendant, can impact the outcome.
- ๐ฃ๏ธ Prosecutors are advised to present all evidence, including weaknesses, to the jury in opening statements to build credibility.
- ๐ค The jury's perception of the defendant's likability can significantly influence the verdict, and in Trump's case, certain evidence may greatly affect his popularity.
- ๐ The 'statement of facts' accompanying the indictment is highlighted as a crucial piece of evidence that reveals Trump's intentions with the hush money payments.
- ๐ฅ The evidence that Trump directed delaying payments to Stormy Daniels until after the election, potentially avoiding payment altogether, is expected to make him highly unpopular in the courtroom.
Q & A
When is Donald Trump's trial set to begin in New York?
-Donald Trump's trial is set to begin in a New York courtroom on Monday, April 15th.
How many times has Donald Trump lost attempts to delay the start of his trial?
-Donald Trump has lost a record-setting string of losses, with the exact number not specified but implied to be at least four times.
What was the judge's response to the defense's argument about the jury pool being influenced by prejudicial news coverage?
-Judge Juan Maram rejected the defense's request to postpone the trial, stating that the idea of holding off the case indefinitely was not tenable and that questioning prospective jurors would address any concerns about their ability to be fair and impartial.
What did the prosecutors argue in response to Trump's request to delay the trial?
-The prosecutors objected to Trump's request, stating that the publicity wasn't likely to wane and that Trump's own comments generated a lot of it. They also noted that with over 1 million people in Manhattan, jury questioning could surely locate 12 impartial jurors.
How does the speaker describe the relationship between popularity and a criminal trial?
-The speaker describes a criminal trial as being somewhat like a popularity contest, where likability and being well-liked can play a role in how various participants are perceived by the jury. This includes the prosecutors, defense attorneys, judge, witnesses, and the defendant.
What is the significance of the 'statement of facts' in the context of the indictment against Donald Trump?
-The 'statement of facts' is a document that accompanies the indictment, outlining some of the evidence and facts of the case. It is a public document that provides context and details about the charges against the defendant.
What specific evidence from the 'statement of facts' is highlighted as particularly damaging to Donald Trump's case?
-The specific evidence highlighted is from paragraph 19, which states that Donald Trump directed Michael Cohen to delay making a payment to Stormy Daniels as long as possible, with the instruction to avoid paying altogether if the payment could be delayed until after the election.
How does the speaker suggest that the jury might perceive Donald Trump based on the evidence presented in the 'statement of facts'?
-The speaker suggests that the jury will perceive Donald Trump negatively, as the evidence portrays him as corrupt, deceitful, and callous, particularly in his handling of the hush money payments and his attempts to avoid them by delaying until after the election.
What is the overarching theme of the speaker's discussion about the trial and its potential outcome?
-The overarching theme is the importance of justice and the belief that the jury, once fully informed of the evidence against Donald Trump, will deliver a verdict based on the facts and the law, ultimately convicting him of his crimes.
What does the speaker imply about the role of public opinion and media coverage in the trial?
-The speaker implies that while public opinion and media coverage can influence perceptions, the ultimate decision in the trial will be based on the evidence presented and the jury's ability to remain impartial, despite any pre-trial publicity.
Outlines
๐๏ธ Trial Popularity and Trump's Unpopularity
This paragraph discusses the analogy of a criminal trial being akin to a popularity contest, specifically in the context of Donald Trump's upcoming trial in New York. It highlights how Trump's repeated attempts to delay the trial have been unsuccessful, and emphasizes the significance of public opinion in the courtroom. The speaker, Glenn Kersner, critiques the defense's argument about prejudicial news coverage and notes the judge's rejection of their request to postpone the trial. The paragraph underscores the idea that the least popular person in the courtroom typically does not fare well.
๐ง The Role of Likability in Criminal Trials
This paragraph delves into the importance of likability in the context of a criminal trial. It explains how both prosecutors and defense attorneys strive to be well-liked and trusted by the judge and jury. The speaker shares personal experiences as a prosecutor, emphasizing the value of honesty and transparency when presenting legal arguments and facts. The paragraph also explores the dynamics between the jury, the attorneys, and the defendant, suggesting that the defendant's popularity can significantly influence the outcome of the trial. It argues that likability is not just about being well-liked, but also about being perceived as trustworthy and straightforward.
๐ Unraveling the Truth Behind Hush Money Payments
The final paragraph focuses on the specifics of the hush money payments made by Donald Trump to Stormy Daniels and the subsequent falsification of business records. It references the indictment and the statement of facts that accompanied it, highlighting paragraph 19, which reveals Trump's instruction to delay payments to Daniels until after the election. The paragraph argues that this evidence will significantly damage Trump's popularity and likability in the eyes of the jury, as it contradicts his claims of protecting Melania's feelings. The speaker asserts that the jury will likely view Trump's actions as corrupt, callous, and criminal, leading to a potential conviction.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กManhattan jury
๐กCriminal trial
๐กHush money
๐กFalsified business records
๐กPublicity
๐กJury selection
๐กFair and impartial
๐กLikability
๐กStatement of facts
๐กJustice matters
Highlights
A criminal trial in Manhattan is likened to a popularity contest.
Donald Trump is set to be the most unpopular person in the courtroom due to the evidence against him.
Trump has lost multiple motions attempting to delay the start of his trial.
The trial is scheduled to begin on Monday, April 15th.
Judge Juan Maran rejected Trump's last-ditch attempt to postpone the hush money trial.
Trump's lawyers argued the jury pool was influenced by prejudicial news coverage.
The judge stated that the idea of indefinite postponement was not tenable.
Prosecutors argued that it's possible to find 12 impartial jurors among over 1 million people in Manhattan.
The concept of 'popularity' in a trial refers to likability and trustworthiness, not just public approval.
Both prosecutors and defense attorneys aim to be the most trusted and liked in the eyes of the jury.
The importance of being honest and straightforward in court to gain the judge's trust is emphasized.
The strategy of presenting all evidence, including weaknesses, upfront to build credibility with the jury is discussed.
A piece of evidence reveals Trump's instruction to delay payments to Stormy Daniels to after the election.
The evidence contradicts Trump's claim that the hush money payments were to protect Melania's feelings.
The trial is expected to highlight Trump's unpopular actions and decisions related to the hush money payments.
The outcome of the trial is anticipated to be a swift conviction due to the strength of the evidence against Trump.
The principle that justice matters is underscored in the context of the trial and its proceedings.
