ChatGPT vs Turnitin's AI II Follow these steps II No AI Score II No Plagiarism I My Research Support
TLDRIn this video, the presenter explores the effectiveness of AI detection tools, specifically Turnitin's, in identifying text generated by Chat GPT. They compare the AI scores and plagiarism rates of original Chat GPT text, text paraphrased using tools like Skillboard and Virtual, and manually rephrased text. The results show varying degrees of similarity and AI scores, with manual rephrasing and specific paraphrasing tools reducing the AI score significantly. The video emphasizes the importance of ethical use of AI tools in research and the necessity of expert review for accurate assessment.
Takeaways
- 🔍 The video discusses the effectiveness of AI detection tools, particularly Turnitin's, in identifying AI-generated text.
- 📝 The presenter uses Chat GPT to generate text and then checks it with Turnitin to see the AI score and plagiarism detection.
- ✍️ The video emphasizes that AI detection tools are not foolproof and suggests using them as a guide rather than a definitive measure.
- 📈 The presenter compares the AI scores of original Chat GPT text, text paraphrased by Skillboard, and text paraphrased by Word Tool.
- 📉 The results show that paraphrasing tools can reduce AI scores, but manual review is still necessary for accuracy.
- 🚫 The video warns against relying solely on Chat GPT for writing research documents, as it may not be ethical or effective for academic purposes.
- 🔄 The presenter suggests that rephrasing the text can help reduce AI scores, but it is not a guaranteed method for avoiding detection.
- 🔍 Turnitin's AI score report is only accessible through an instructor account, and it requires a manual review for a proper assessment.
- 📝 The video mentions other tools like Originality.ai but notes that Turnitin is more commonly used in universities.
- 📌 The presenter offers to create more videos on specific topics or tools if the audience is interested.
- 📺 The video encourages viewers to subscribe to the channel for more content on similar topics.
Q & A
What was the main focus of the video?
-The main focus of the video was to demonstrate how AI detection tools, specifically Turnitin's AI detection tool, can identify text generated by Chat GPT and the effectiveness of paraphrasing tools in reducing AI scores and plagiarism.
What are the limitations of AI detection tools mentioned in the video?
-The video mentions that AI detection tools are not entirely efficient and may not always accurately detect AI-generated text or plagiarism.
How does the video demonstrate the use of paraphrasing tools?
-The video demonstrates the use of paraphrasing tools by generating text with Chat GPT and then rephrasing it using tools like Skillboard and Virtual. The rephrased text is then checked in Turnitin to see the impact on AI scores and plagiarism.
What was the AI score for the text generated by Chat GPT and checked in Turnitin?
-The AI score for the text generated by Chat GPT and checked in Turnitin was 23% similarity, indicating a significant amount of detectable content.
How did the paraphrasing tools perform in reducing the AI score and plagiarism?
-The paraphrasing tools performed differently, with Quillboard reducing the similarity to 22% and WordTune reducing it to 5%. However, the AI score for the text rephrased by Quillboard was zero, indicating no detected plagiarism, while the AI score for the text rephrased by WordTune was also zero.
What is the importance of manually reviewing text after using paraphrasing tools?
-Manual review is important because paraphrasing tools may replace non-technical or irrelevant words, and they are not 100% accurate. Manual attention ensures that the text remains coherent and accurately reflects the intended meaning.
What is the significance of the AI score in Turnitin reports?
-The AI score in Turnitin reports indicates the level of similarity between the submitted document and other sources. A high AI score suggests potential plagiarism, but it requires expert review to determine if academic misconduct has occurred.
Why is it not advisable to write entire research documents using Chat GPT?
-Writing entire research documents using Chat GPT is not advisable because it may lead to ethical concerns and potential plagiarism. Chat GPT should be used as a辅助工具 in research, not as a substitute for original work.
What other tool did the video mention for checking originality besides Turnitin?
-The video mentioned Originality.ai as another tool for checking originality, but it noted that many universities prefer using Turnitin due to its widespread adoption and reliability.
How can viewers contribute to future video topics?
-Viewers can suggest specific topics for future videos by commenting on the video, allowing the creator to prepare content that addresses their interests and questions.
Outlines
🔍 AI Detection Tools and Turnitin's AIR
This paragraph discusses the use of AI detection tools, particularly Turnitin's AIR, for identifying AI-generated text. The speaker mentions a previous video on AI detection tools and chat GPT, and how they can detect AI-scored text. The video aims to explore whether paraphrasing tools like Skillboard and Virtual can reduce AI scores and plagiarism. The speaker emphasizes that while AI tools like chat GPT are useful, they should not replace the entire research process and must be used ethically. The video also previews a future discussion on the disadvantages of using chat GPT in research.
📝 Analyzing Plagiarism and AI Scores with Turnitin
The speaker presents the results of using Turnitin to check AI-generated text and text rephrased with paraphrasing tools. They compare the plagiarism and AI scores of the original AI-generated text, text rephrased by Skillboard, and text rephrased by Virtual. The results show varying degrees of similarity and AI scores, with the Virtual tool showing the lowest AI score. The speaker concludes that while paraphrasing tools can help reduce AI scores, manual attention is necessary for accuracy. They also mention the possibility of creating a video on another tool, Originality.ai, if there is interest.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI detection tools
💡Chat GPT
💡Turnitin
💡Plagiarism
💡Paraphrasing tools
💡AI score
💡Academic misconduct
💡Research ethics
💡Originality.ai
💡Subscription
Highlights
The video discusses AI detection tools and their efficiency.
Previous video covered AI detection tools and their limitations.
The video will demonstrate using Turnitin's AI detection tool, widely used by universities and journals.
Text will be generated with Chat GPT and checked for AI score using Turnitin.
The video will explore if paraphrasing tools can reduce AI score and plagiarism.
Using Chat GPT for entire research documents is discouraged.
Chat GPT is a helpful tool in research, but ethical and unethical uses must be considered.
The video will also discuss the disadvantages of using Chat GPT.
Two paraphrasing tools, Skillboard and Virtual, are used to rephrase text.
Manual attention is required when using paraphrasing tools to avoid non-technical or irrelevant words.
The sequence of words generated by Chat GPT can reduce AI score.
Turnitin's AI score report is only accessible with an instructor account.
The AI score may not always indicate academic misconduct; expert review is necessary.
The video shows a 23% similarity and AI score for text generated by Chat GPT.
Quillboard and WordTune paraphrasing tools reduce similarity to 22% and 5%, respectively.
Turnitin does not detect text refreshed by Quillboard, showing a 0% AI score.
WordTune reduces the AI score to 0%, indicating a lower likelihood of plagiarism.
Other tools like Originality.ai are mentioned, but Turnitin is preferred by many universities.
The video concludes by encouraging viewers to subscribe and suggest topics for future videos.