GBD4 vs CLA2: Which AI Writing Assistant Should You Choose?

Table of Contents

• Comparing Context Windows: GBD4 Handles More Text
• Evaluating Precision: GBD4 Follows Instructions Better
• Comparing Article Length and Quality
• AI Detection Favors CLA2, But GBD4 Wins Overall
• Conclusion and Recommendation

Comparing Context Windows: GBD4 Handles More Text

Paragraph under first H2 talking about GBD4's larger context window.

GBD4 was able to process a large 9-essay prompt up to 128k tokens, while CLA2 failed at 100k tokens.

GBD4 Passes Test With 128k Token Limit

GBD4 successfully handled a prompt just under 1,000 words long consisting of 9 essay titles. This demonstrates its 128k token context capacity. More details and analysis of this test case.

CLA2 Fails Test With 100k Token Limit

In contrast, CLA2 failed on the same prompt, hitting its 100k token context length limit. Further examination of why CLA2 was not able to handle the full prompt.

Evaluating Precision: GBD4 Follows Instructions Better

Paragraph analyzing GBD4's superior ability to precisely follow prompts and instructions vs CLA2.

Examples highlighted GBD4 properly including links and formatting when instructed, while CLA2 did not.

GBD4 Includes Links and Formatting As Instructed

Details on test case prompting GBD4 to use certain markdown and links, which it successfully followed. More analysis of GBD4's precision in this area.

CLA2 Ignores Links and Overall Instructions

In the same test, CLA2 failed to include the instructed links and formatting. Further examination of why CLA2 failed to precisely follow all prompt instructions.

FAQ

Q: What context length can GBD4 handle?
A: GBD4 can handle up to 128,000 tokens of text.

Q: How precisely did GBD4 follow formatting instructions?
A: GBD4 successfully included links, Markdown formatting, lists, and tables when instructed.

Q: How long was the GBD4 article?
A: The GBD4 article was 1,700 words, longer than the CLA2 article.

Q: Which tool had better readability?
A: CLA2 scored a grade level 7, while GBD4 was grade level 10.

Q: Which tool had less plagiarism?
A: GBD4 scored 0% plagiarism compared to 10% for CLA2.

Q: How did SEO scores compare?
A: SEO scores were very similar, around 70-72 for both tools.

Q: Which was more original?
A: CLA2 was 34% original compared to just 7% for GBD4.

Q: Should I cancel my CLA2 subscription?
A: For most use cases, GBD4 is recommended over CLA2 now.

Q: What were GBD4's main advantages?
A: GBD4 handled more text, followed instructions better, had less plagiarism, and output a longer article.

Q: What metrics favored CLA2?
A: CLA2 had slightly better readability and more originality.