Minvo Review: Opus Clip Alternative | Use AI to Create Shorts & Tiktok Videos
TLDRThe video discusses the release of a new application, MVO, on Appsumo. The reviewer shares their experience using the software, comparing it to similar tools like Opus Clip and Munch. They highlight MVO's capabilities in creating short clips from long-form content, adding captions, and grading the quality of the AI-generated shorts. The review also covers MVO's pricing plans, features, and the founder's roadmap for future improvements. Despite some initial issues with video processing and user interface, the reviewer is impressed with the software's editing tools and potential for future updates, giving it a 4.5-star rating.
Takeaways
- ๐ The video discusses a new software tool called MVO, which was recently released on Appsumo and is similar to existing tools like Opus Clip and Munch.
- ๐ MVO is designed to help content creators, especially YouTubers, by taking long-form content and generating short clips, complete with AI-generated captions and scores indicating the clips' potential quality.
- ๐ก The reviewer has experience with Opus Clip and shares that MVO seems to be a competitor with similar functionality but also has its unique features.
- ๐ง MVO offers a range of plans with varying features, storage, and export limits, aiming to cater to different user needs, from individual creators to agencies.
- ๐ The software supports multiple social media platforms for posting and scheduling, including YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok.
- ๐ฌ The reviewer notes that MVO's user interface has some issues, particularly with finding and accessing user-uploaded videos, which the developers need to address.
- ๐ฅ MVO provides an extensive video editing platform, which the reviewer found to be impressive and user-friendly, even allowing for editing in different aspect ratios like 9:16 or 16:9.
- ๐ The software includes a feature called 'Magic' that offers automated editing suggestions, such as focusing on speakers, cutting filler words, and adding emojis or media.
- ๐ฐ The pricing for MVO is considered realistic and competitive, with the most popular plan being the Pro version at $19.99 per month, offering 120 minutes per month, one user, and 90 days of video storage.
- ๐ง The reviewer experienced a delay in video processing and suggests that MVO may need to scale their servers to handle the influx of new users from Appsumo.
- ๐ MVO's developers have shown responsiveness to user feedback, making adjustments like unlimited exports for all plans, which the reviewer appreciates and sees as a positive sign for the software's future.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the video review?
-The main focus of the video review is to discuss and evaluate the features and performance of a newly released software called MVO, which is similar to Opus Clip and Munch in terms of creating short video clips from long-form content.
How does the reviewer describe the functionality of MVO in relation to Opus Clip and Munch?
-The reviewer describes MVO as an alternative to Opus Clip and Munch, with similar functionalities such as uploading long-form content, splitting it into clips, grading the AI's perception of the clips' quality, and adding captions.
What are some of the key features of MVO mentioned in the review?
-Some key features of MVO mentioned in the review include the ability to upload long-form content, automatically generate short clips, grade the clips based on AI analysis, add captions, and utilize a full-screen video editor for further customization.
What is the reviewer's opinion on the pricing of MVO?
-The reviewer believes that the pricing of MVO is realistic and well-structured, offering different tiers to accommodate various user needs without inflating the prices to seem more valuable than they actually are.
How does the reviewer address the issue of the 20 exports per month limit in the initial plan?
-The reviewer points out that the initial 20 exports per month limit seems too low and suggests that it should be increased. However, after user feedback, the company updated the plan to offer unlimited exports for all users, which the reviewer appreciates as a positive adjustment.
What is the reviewer's experience with the user interface and navigation of MVO?
-The reviewer experiences some difficulties with the user interface and navigation of MVO, particularly in finding and accessing their uploaded video and the editing features. They mention this as a flaw that needs to be fixed.
How does the reviewer compare MVO's video editor to Opus Clip's?
-The reviewer finds MVO's video editor to be more impressive and better developed than Opus Clip's. They highlight the full-screen editing interface and the range of editing options available as superior aspects of MVO.
What is the reviewer's final verdict on MVO?
-The reviewer gives MVO a rating of 4.5 or higher, considering it a solid software with a good user interface, an impressive video editor, and responsive customer service. They recommend picking up MVO, especially for users who need a tool to create short video clips from long-form content.
What are some of the improvements or updates made by MVO based on user feedback?
-Based on user feedback, MVO made improvements such as removing the limit on video exports, which was initially set at 20 per month, and addressing issues related to user interface and video access.
How does the reviewer suggest MVO could be improved in the future?
-The reviewer suggests that MVO could improve by fixing the user interface issues related to video access and navigation, and by considering user suggestions for features such as the ability to prompt the AI to look for specific topics.
Outlines
๐บ Introduction to MVO and Appsumo
The speaker introduces the topic of MVO, a new application featured on Appsumo, which is known for releasing new applications every Monday. The speaker notes the lack of reviews, indicating a recent release, and expresses intent to review the software. The speaker discusses the use of Opus Clip and Munch, two similar tools for creating short clips from long-form content, and mentions the existence of an alternative tool, Descript. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency in acknowledging competitors and plans to review the functionality and pricing of MVO.
๐ฐ Pricing and Features of MVO and Competitors
The speaker delves into the pricing plans and features of MVO, comparing them with its competitors. The plans are categorized into Creator, Pro, Pro Plus, and three tiers of licensing with Appsumo. The speaker notes the realistic pricing and the flexibility of adding more minutes as needed. The features discussed include video upload limits, exports, user access, and storage duration. The speaker also mentions the importance of team functionality and the potential need for multiple users, especially for managing multiple brands.
๐ฅ Uploading and Initial Experience with MVO
The speaker describes the process of uploading a video to MVO and the initial user experience. The speaker highlights the need for long-form videos and the platform's ability to process and analyze them. The speaker also discusses the platform's request for user analytics, such as content type and role, to optimize the video. The speaker mentions the platform's social media presence and the ongoing AI processing of the uploaded video.
๐ Comparing MVO with Opus Clip
The speaker compares MVO with Opus Clip, noting similarities in functionality and user interface. The speaker discusses the process of uploading a YouTube link to Opus Clip and the AI's ability to generate clips, titles, and descriptions. The speaker also mentions additional features like changing video formats and the option to purchase credits. The comparison highlights the potential for MVO to offer similar or improved features.
๐ ๏ธ Exploring MVO's Editing Tools and Interface
The speaker explores the editing tools and interface of MVO, noting the platform's expansive editing capabilities. The speaker discusses the ability to add text, emojis, overlays, and media to videos. The speaker also mentions the platform's magic features, such as autoframing and autocutting, and the option to adjust the display format of videos. The speaker expresses some confusion regarding certain features and the process for saving edited videos.
๐ Updates and Community Feedback on MVO
The speaker discusses updates to MVO in response to community feedback, particularly regarding the export limit issue. The speaker notes that the platform has removed the export limit, allowing unlimited exports for all users. The speaker also highlights the platform's responsiveness to user inquiries and the addition of social media account connections. The speaker addresses questions about the AI's ability to focus on specific topics and the potential for future updates.
๐ Final Thoughts and Recommendations on MVO
The speaker concludes with final thoughts on MVO, rating it as a 4.5 or higher out of 5. The speaker praises the platform's user interface, editing tools, and responsiveness to customer feedback. Despite some initial issues with finding videos and the moments feature, the speaker is impressed with the platform's adjustments and overall functionality. The speaker recommends MVO, particularly the license tier 4 for its sweet spot of features and pricing, and invites others to share their thoughts.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กMVO
๐กAppsumo
๐กOpus Clip
๐กMunch
๐กAI Writing
๐กVideo Transcription
๐กUser Interface
๐กPricing Plans
๐กVideo Editing
๐กCustomer Support
Highlights
The review discusses the release of a new application, MVO, on Appsumo, a platform known for introducing new applications every Monday.
MVO appears to be an alternative to existing software Opus Clip and Munch, which are designed for utilizing long-form content by splitting it into clips and adding features like captions.
The reviewer has experience with Opus Clip, having purchased credits and used the software for its effectiveness in handling long-form content for YouTube.
MVO's website claims that users can create Pro Clipped Clips in just three clicks, positioning itself as a competitor to Opus Clip and Munch.
The reviewer notes that MVO does not mention its competitors, which is unusual as it is common practice in software reviewing to acknowledge the tools being mimicked.
Descript is mentioned as an alternative to MVO, Opus Clip, and Munch, offering video transcription and the ability to create shorts.
MVO's pricing structure is discussed, with different plans offering varying features such as video uploads, exports, user access, and file storage.
The Appsumo plan for MVO is highlighted, offering unlimited posting and scheduling to social media, AI writing assistance, and other features starting at $59 per month.
The reviewer provides a detailed analysis of the pricing, exports, and storage options available at different license tiers.
MVO's road map is examined, with features under planning, in progress, and complete, showing the development direction of the software.
The reviewer experiences a delay in video processing with MVO, highlighting a potential issue with server bandwidth and customer influx from Appsumo.
The user interface of MVO is critiqued, with the reviewer pointing out a flaw in the navigation and accessibility of customer's videos.
MVO's video editor is praised for its functionality and ease of use, offering a variety of editing tools and options.
The reviewer compares MVO's features with Opus Clip, noting differences in video formatting and the addition of overlays and media.
MVO's AI writer and its ability to enhance videos with text, emojis, and other elements is discussed, along with its effectiveness.
The review concludes with an overall positive impression of MVO, despite some initial issues, and the software earns a rating of 4.5 or higher.
