Understanding false positives within Turnitin’s AI writing detection capabilities

Turnitin
23 May 202303:37

TLDRDavid Adamson, an AI scientist at Turnitin, discusses the company's new AI writing detector for instructors. The tool prioritizes precision to ensure reliability, potentially leading to missed AI-written content but aiming for a low false positive rate. The evaluation set includes diverse academic documents, and the detector is fine-tuned for English language prose. Challenges with repetitive writing and non-prose formats are acknowledged, and the system is designed to be fair, with ongoing efforts to improve its accuracy for developing writers and English language learners.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 Turnitin is preparing to introduce an AI writing detector for instructors to understand student use of AI writing tools.
  • 🎯 The AI writing detector prioritizes precision, aiming to be highly confident when identifying AI-written documents.
  • 🚫 The focus on precision may lead to a lower recall rate, meaning some AI-written content might not be detected.
  • 📚 The evaluation set is diverse, representing various academic writing styles, including mixed AI and human writing.
  • 📈 A high precision target is set, with only text scoring above the threshold considered AI-written.
  • 🤖 False positives are expected, with a rate of about one percent for fully human-written documents.
  • 🔄 Repetitive writing, even if not AI-generated, may be mistakenly identified as AI writing due to redundancy.
  • 📝 The detector is designed for English language prose and may not perform well with lists, outlines, short questions, code, or poetry.
  • 🌐 The false positive rate is slightly higher for middle and high school students compared to higher education, but still close to the one percent target.
  • 🌟 Turnitin is committed to monitoring for biases against English language learners and aims for fairness in its AI tools.
  • 🤝 Instructors are encouraged to interpret the AI tool's output with context and knowledge of their students.

Q & A

  • What is Turnitin preparing to share with instructors?

    -Turnitin is preparing to share an AI writing sector with instructors to help them understand how students are using AI writing tools.

  • What is the primary goal of Turnitin's AI writing detector?

    -The primary goal is to prioritize precision, ensuring that when Turnitin identifies a document as AI-written, it is highly confident in that prediction.

  • What is the consequence of prioritizing precision in Turnitin's AI writing detector?

    -Prioritizing precision may result in a lower recall, meaning some AI-written content might be missed, but the aim is to be more accurate about the findings.

  • How does Turnitin set a threshold for its AI writing predictions?

    -Turnitin uses a large set of documents representing various ways people write in an academic context, including AI-generated text, to set a high precision target for its predictions.

  • What is the expected false positive rate for Turnitin's AI writing detector?

    -The expected false positive rate is about one percent for fully human-written documents.

  • In what types of writing does Turnitin's AI writing detector struggle?

    -The detector is designed for English language prose and may struggle with lists, outlines, short questions, code, or poetry due to their self-similarity.

  • How does Turnitin address the potential for false positives in repetitive writing?

    -Turnitin acknowledges that repetitive writing, even if not AI-generated, may be incorrectly predicted as AI writing due to its redundancy.

  • Are there any biases in Turnitin's AI writing detector against English language learners?

    -Turnitin has not yet seen evidence of bias against English language learners from any country, and they are monitoring this closely as they move towards production.

  • How does Turnitin handle the challenge of developing writers and English language learners?

    -Turnitin has intentionally oversampled such writing in both their training data and evaluation set to address this challenge.

  • What is Turnitin's approach to handling errors in their AI writing detector?

    -Turnitin aims to own their mistakes, understand when and how they might be wrong, and share this information with users for a fair and transparent approach.

Outlines

00:00

🤖 Introduction to AI Writing Detection

David Adamson, an AI scientist and former high school teacher at Turnitin, introduces an AI writing sector that will be shared with instructors. The focus is on the reliability of Turnitin's predictions, with a priority on precision over recall. This means that while some AI-written content might be missed, the system aims to be highly confident when it identifies AI writing. The evaluation set is a diverse collection of documents representing various academic writing styles, including AI-assisted and authentic writing. The threshold for AI writing detection is set high to ensure precision.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI writing sector

The AI writing sector refers to the use of artificial intelligence tools to generate written content. In the context of the video, it is about Turnitin's development of a feature to detect AI-generated writing among students' submissions. This is a significant aspect of the video as it introduces the main topic of discussion.

💡Precision

Precision, in the context of the AI detector, is the measure of how accurate the system is when it correctly identifies AI-written content. The video emphasizes the importance of precision over recall, meaning the system is designed to minimize false positives rather than miss detections.

💡Recall

Recall is the ability of the AI detector to find all relevant instances of AI writing. The video mentions that by prioritizing precision, there might be a trade-off in recall, leading to potential missed detections of AI writing.

💡Evaluation set

An evaluation set is a collection of documents used to test and calibrate the AI detector. It represents various writing styles and includes AI-written and human-written texts. This set helps in setting the threshold for the detector's predictions.

💡False positive rate

The false positive rate is the percentage of human-written documents incorrectly identified as AI-written by the detector. The video mentions an acceptable rate of about one percent, indicating the system's accuracy.

💡Redundant writing

Redundant writing refers to the repetition of ideas or phrases in a text. The video explains that such writing might be mistakenly flagged as AI-generated due to its repetitive nature.

💡English language prose

English language prose refers to the natural, continuous form of written English used in paragraphs. The AI detector is designed for this format and may not perform as well with other forms like lists, outlines, or poetry.

💡Developing writers

Developing writers are those who are still learning and improving their writing skills. The video discusses the challenge of distinguishing between AI writing and the writing of students who may naturally produce more repetitive content.

💡Bias

Bias in the context of AI refers to the system's tendency to favor or disfavor certain groups, such as English language learners from specific countries. The video assures that there is no evidence of such bias in the AI detector.

💡Production

Production in this context refers to the final stages of developing and releasing the AI writing detector for widespread use. The video indicates that the team is actively working towards this goal while maintaining a focus on precision and fairness.

Highlights

Turnitin is preparing to share an AI writing detector with instructors.

The AI writing detector prioritizes precision over recall.

A lower recall means some AI writing might be missed.

The evaluation set includes a variety of documents to represent academic writing.

Only texts with high detection scores are considered AI-written.

False positives are expected, particularly in repetitive writing.

The detector is designed for English language prose, not for lists, outlines, or code.

False positive rates are slightly higher for middle and high school students.

Turnitin is actively monitoring for biases against English language learners.

The company aims for precision and fairness in their AI predictions.

Instructors are encouraged to interpret the AI predictions with context.

Turnitin is transparent about the potential for false positives.

The AI writing detector is not yet perfect but continuous improvement is ongoing.

The false positive rate for fully human-written documents is about one percent.

Turnitin is committed to owning their mistakes and understanding their limitations.

The AI writing detector is being fine-tuned for various writing styles and educational levels.