Google Imagen 3 vs Midjourney: Google's AI Finally Beats Midjourney?!
TLDRThis video compares Google's Imagen 3 and Midjourney, two AI-driven image generation models. The narrator discusses the accessibility of Imagen 3 through Gemini and its limitations, such as the inability to create people on the free version and the square format restriction. The comparison highlights Midjourney's artistic style and Imagen 3's realism in portraiture. The video showcases various prompts and the resulting images, suggesting that while Imagen 3 excels in realistic images, Midjourney captures an artistic edge, especially in non-photographic styles. The narrator invites viewers to share their thoughts on which AI image generator they prefer.
Takeaways
- 😀 Google's Imagin 3, a high-quality texture image model, is now accessible through Gemini.
- 🔍 The video compares Imagin 3 directly with the popular text-to-image model, Midjourney.
- 🚫 Imagin 3 has limitations; the free version cannot create images of people, and all images are in a square format.
- 🎨 Midjourney is favored for its distinct artistic style, which makes the generated images feel more real.
- 🤖 The quality of AI-generated images has improved significantly, making them harder to distinguish from non-AI images.
- 📸 Imagin 3 excels in portraiture and photographic realism, especially when using detailed prompts.
- 🎭 Midjourney stands out for capturing artistic styles and creating images with an artistic edge.
- 🖼️ When generating artistic paintings rather than photographs, Midjourney seems to perform better.
- 📱 The speed of Imagin 3 is highlighted, with images being generated in real-time.
- 🌐 The importance of good prompting is emphasized for achieving better results with AI image generators.
Q & A
What is Google Imagen 3 and how does it relate to Gemini?
-Google Imagen 3 is Google's high-quality texture image model, which is now available directly through Gemini. It's not a separate app but is self-contained within Gemini.
Why did the speaker choose to compare Google Imagen 3 with Midjourney?
-The speaker chose to compare Google Imagen 3 with Midjourney because Midjourney is their favorite text-to-image model due to its particular artistic style, and they wanted to see which one works better and is more preferred.
What limitations does Google Imagen 3 have regarding the creation of images of people?
-Google Imagen 3 cannot create images of people in the free version, but it can in the advanced version. Additionally, the images are always in a square format and cannot be adjusted to other aspect ratios like landscape.
How does the speaker describe the artistic style of Midjourney?
-The speaker describes Midjourney's artistic style as having a distinct, more stylistic, and interesting artistic flair that makes the images feel more real and less like typical AI-generated images.
What is the speaker's opinion on the realism of images generated by Midjourney?
-The speaker believes that some images generated by Midjourney are so good that you can't tell they're AI-generated, which is a testament to the quality and realism of the images produced by this model.
How does the speed of Google Imagen 3 compare to other AI image generators mentioned in the script?
-The speaker highlights that one of the great things about Google Imagen 3 is its speed, as the image generation is done in real-time, which is faster than other AI image generators they have used.
What is the speaker's view on using AI-generated images in professional settings like courses or workshops?
-The speaker suggests that AI-generated images, especially those from Midjourney, can be used to impress and educate in professional settings like courses or workshops, as they showcase the capabilities of AI art generation.
How does the speaker compare the artistic capabilities of Google Imagen 3 and Midjourney?
-The speaker finds that while Google Imagen 3 is good at portraiture and realistic images, Midjourney excels in capturing artistic styles and has an edge when it comes to creating images with an artistic flair.
What is the speaker's opinion on the use of prompting in AI image generation?
-The speaker emphasizes the importance of good prompting in AI image generation, noting that it can greatly affect the outcome and that creativity plays a role in crafting effective prompts for AI models like Midjourney.
What does the speaker think about the image quality of Google Imagen 3 compared to older AI image generators?
-The speaker is impressed with the realism and quality of images generated by Google Imagen 3, noting that they are a significant improvement over the AI images from 12 months ago and are much better than what is typically shown in AI workshops.
How does the speaker evaluate the artistic style of images generated by Google Imagen 3 and Midjourney?
-The speaker evaluates the artistic style by comparing the distinct styles, the level of detail, the capture of character, and the overall feel of the images. They find Midjourney's images to have a more artistic edge, while Google Imagen 3's images are more realistic and suitable for portraits and stock photography.
Outlines
🖼️ Introduction to Image Generation Models
The speaker introduces the availability of Google's image model, Imagen 3, through Gemini and expresses excitement to compare it with their preferred text-to-image model, Mid Journey. They discuss the integration of Imagen 3 into Gemini, noting the convenience of not needing a separate app and their subscription to Gemini Advance for AI queries. The speaker highlights limitations of Imagen 3, such as the inability to create people in the free version and its square format restriction. They plan to use Mid Journey prompts for a fair comparison, acknowledging Mid Journey's distinct artistic style and realism in its images.
🎨 Artistic Comparison of Image Generators
The speaker compares the artistic capabilities of Imagen 3 and Mid Journey, noting that Mid Journey excels in artistic paintings while Imagen 3 performs well in photographic-style images. They discuss the distinct styles of each, with Mid Journey offering a more chaotic and graffiti-like style, and Imagen 3 providing clean lines but lacking the artistic chaos. The speaker shares examples of prompts used for Mid Journey to create graffiti-style images and album covers, emphasizing the importance of creativity in prompting AI art generation. They also mention their own project involving creating an album cover with AI, including lyrics from a song they created.
📸 Image Generation for Portraits and Realism
The speaker continues the comparison by focusing on portraiture and realism in image generation. They note that Imagen 3 is capable of creating realistic portraits, but Mid Journey offers a more artistic and creative approach. Examples include a coffee bar selfie and a pencil drawing of Godzilla, where Mid Journey's version has more artistic flair. The speaker also discusses their son's project of creating a bow house-inspired skateboard, comparing the AI-generated images to the original designs. They conclude that while Imagen 3 is good for photographic realism, Mid Journey stands out for its artistic capabilities.
🖋️ The Role of Prompting in AI Image Generation
The speaker delves into the importance of prompting in AI image generation, using examples of creating portraits with both Imagen (referred to as 'imagin') and Mid Journey. They discuss how specific and detailed prompts can lead to more realistic and artistic images, comparing older versions of Mid Journey with the current one. The speaker shares their experiences with creating images using technical terms like shutter speed and black and white photography, noting how these details can enhance the quality and style of the generated images. They also touch upon the use of AI images in corporate settings and the need for better prompting education.
☕️ Comparing Generic and Artistic AI Image Prompts
The speaker compares the results of using generic and artistic prompts in AI image generation. They use the example of a man drinking a cup of coffee, showing how a simple prompt leads to a generic AI image, while a more detailed and artistic prompt results in a more interesting and creative output. The speaker also recreates a previous Mid Journey image of a Japanese woman on a beach, comparing the artistic styles generated by Mid Journey and Imagen 3. They conclude that while Imagen 3 produces good generic images, Mid Journey excels in creating images with an artistic edge.
🏞️ Artistic Styles and Realism in AI Image Generation
The speaker discusses the ability of AI image generators to capture artistic styles and realism. They compare Imagen 3 and Mid Journey in creating images with a specific artistic style, such as 'splatter fashion'. The speaker notes that while Imagen 3 can produce good generic images, Mid Journey has an advantage in capturing the artistic style and nuance, as seen in the comparison of the beach image. They also mention the evolution of AI image generation, stating that the current models are far superior to those from a year ago. The speaker encourages viewers to share their thoughts on the comparison and to try different AI image generators.
📹 Wrapping Up the AI Image Generation Discussion
The speaker concludes the video by summarizing their thoughts on AI image generation, expressing their preference for Mid Journey due to its artistic style and the realism of its images. They invite viewers to share their opinions on Imagen 3 and other AI image generators in the comments section and to like and subscribe for more content. The speaker also reminds viewers to check out other videos on the channel, emphasizing the value of viewer engagement and support.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Imagen 3
💡Midjourney
💡Gemini
💡AI Image Generation
💡Prompts
💡Artistic Style
💡Realism
💡Inpainting and Outpainting
💡Text-to-Image Models
💡Generative AI
Highlights
Google's Imagen 3, a high-quality texture image model, is now available through Gemini.
Comparison between Imagen 3 and Midjourney, a favorite text-to-image model.
Imagen 3 is integrated within Gemini and doesn't require a separate app.
Imagen 3's free version cannot create images of people, but the advanced version can.
Imagen 3 images are restricted to a square format, unlike landscape or portrait ratios.
Midjourney is favored for its distinct artistic style and high-quality images.
Midjourney's images often feel more real and less like AI-generated art.
Imagen 3 is praised for its speed in generating images in real time.
Imagen 3 excels in portraiture, producing realistic and high-fidelity images.
Midjourney is better at capturing artistic styles and has a more distinct flair.
Imagen 3's images sometimes lack the artistic chaos and style present in Midjourney's outputs.
Midjourney can recreate the medium and texture of the artwork, such as an old album cover.
Imagen 3's outputs are more like clean, corporate photography compared to Midjourney's artistic style.
Midjourney's ability to understand and apply artistic styles is superior for creating unique images.
Imagen 3 is capable of creating good generic, realistic images suitable for thumbnails or stock photography.
For artistic edge in images, Midjourney is still preferred over Imagen 3.
Imagen 3 has improved significantly from older AI image generators, offering more realistic images.
The importance of specific prompting for AI image generation is highlighted, affecting the quality and style of outputs.
