New top AI image generator?! Seedream 3.0

AI Search
18 Apr 202530:59

TLDRThe video explores Seedream 3.0, ByteDance's latest AI image generator, comparing it to GPT40 through various prompts. Seedream excels in generating realistic, imperfect images like school yearbook photos and low-quality amateur snapshots, often outperforming GPT40 in terms of realism and art styles. However, GPT40 is superior in text generation, accuracy of existing characters, and infographics. Seedream is faster and less censored, offering free daily credits and new features like a video model and lip-sync tool. The review concludes that while Seedream is impressive for certain tasks, GPT40 remains unparalleled in text-heavy prompts.

Takeaways

  • 🚀 Seedream 3.0 is ByteDance's latest AI image generator, reportedly competitive with OpenAI's GPT-40 based on an independent leaderboard by Artificial Analysis.
  • 🌐 Seedream 3.0 can be accessed via dreamina.capcut.com and offers various resolution and aspect ratio options for image generation.
  • 🎨 The script tests Seedream 3.0 on a variety of prompts, including school yearbook pages, isometric 3D scenes, recursive images, and human anatomy, comparing its performance with GPT-40.
  • 📈 Seedream 3.0 generally excels at generating realistic and imperfect images, making them appear more natural compared to GPT-40's polished outputs.
  • 🤖 GPT-40 is superior in text generation and maintaining character consistency, especially in complex prompts involving long text snippets.
  • 🖼️ Seedream 3.0 is better at generating certain art styles, such as anime illustrations and 3D Pixar scenes, while GPT-40 struggles with 3D styles.
  • 🌟 Seedream 3.0 can generate images of existing celebrities and characters more freely than GPT-40, which is more restrictive due to censorship policies.
  • 📝 Seedream 3.0 offers a reference feature allowing users to apply elements from previously generated images to new generations, though it uses an older model (Cream 2.0) for this feature.
  • 💰 Seedream 3.0 provides 150 free credits per day, allowing users to generate up to 50 images daily with the new model, making it more accessible for frequent use.
  • 📊 Overall, Seedream 3.0 is praised for its speed, realism, and versatility in art styles, but it falls short in text generation and consistency compared to GPT-40.
  • 👀 The script concludes that Seedream 3.0 is a strong contender in the AI image generation space, especially for users seeking realistic and diverse visual outputs.

Q & A

  • What is Seedream 3.0, and how does it compare to GPT40 according to the independent evaluator Artificial Analysis?

    -Seedream 3.0 is ByteDance's latest image model. According to the leaderboard by Artificial Analysis, it is tied for the number one place with GPT40, with very close ELO scores. However, within the given confidence interval, there is no significant difference between the two.

  • How does Seedream 3.0 perform when generating a school yearbook page compared to GPT40?

    -Seedream 3.0 generates a more realistic yearbook page with variations in student faces, hairstyles, and poses. The generated images look imperfect and natural, similar to an actual yearbook photo. In contrast, GPT40's generation is sharper and more polished but does not resemble a typical yearbook page as closely.

  • What are the strengths of Seedream 3.0 in generating isometric 3D scenes?

    -Seedream 3.0 excels at generating isometric 3D scenes. It accurately incorporates all specified elements, such as furniture, colors, and objects, and creates a more realistic and imperfect look compared to GPT40, which tends to produce overly polished images.

  • How does Seedream 3.0 handle recursive prompts like 'a person holding a photo of herself holding a photo of herself'?

    -Seedream 3.0 struggles with the recursive depth of this prompt, only generating two levels of photos instead of the required three. GPT40, on the other hand, goes one level too deep. Neither model gets the prompt completely correct, but Seedream's overall aesthetic appears more realistic.

  • What are Seedream 3.0's capabilities in generating images of existing celebrities compared to GPT40?

    -Seedream 3.0 is less restrictive and can generate images of existing celebrities more freely than GPT40, which often refuses to generate such images due to policy restrictions. Seedream's generated images may not always be perfect but generally capture the essence of the celebrities.

  • How does Seedream 3.0 perform in generating realistic human anatomy, such as a woman doing a handstand?

    -Seedream 3.0 can generate realistic human poses, such as a woman doing a handstand with one leg bent and the other extended. While it may not always achieve perfect accuracy, it often produces more natural and imperfect results compared to GPT40, which generates sharper but more idealized images.

  • What are the limitations of Seedream 3.0 in generating text compared to GPT40?

    -Seedream 3.0 struggles with generating long snippets of text accurately and consistently. For example, it may fail to generate complete handwritten text in a diary or comic panels. GPT40, however, excels in text generation and can produce accurate and detailed text in various contexts.

  • How does Seedream 3.0 handle the generation of different art styles, such as anime or 3D Pixar animation?

    -Seedream 3.0 performs well in generating various art styles. For anime, it produces high-quality illustrations, while for 3D Pixar animation, it can create detailed and realistic scenes. In contrast, GPT40 may struggle with 3D styles and produce less accurate results.

  • What are the advantages of Seedream 3.0 in terms of speed and cost?

    -Seedream 3.0 is very fast, generating four images in about 10 seconds. It also offers 150 free credits per day, allowing users to generate up to 50 images daily at no cost. This makes it more accessible and efficient compared to GPT40, which has longer wait times and more limited free usage.

  • What are the key differences between Seedream 3.0 and GPT40 in terms of image generation?

    -Seedream 3.0 is better at generating realistic and imperfect images, excels in various art styles, and is faster and less expensive. GPT40, however, is superior in text generation, consistency, and detail accuracy. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the user.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Introduction and Comparison of Seedream 3 and GPT40

The paragraph introduces a new image generation model called Seedream 3 by Byte Dance and compares it with OpenAI's GPT40. According to an independent evaluator, Seedream 3 is tied with GPT40 in terms of ELO score, indicating comparable performance. The author explains how to use Seedream 3 through the website dreamina.capcut.com, highlighting its ease of use and the ability to select different resolutions and aspect ratios. The paragraph then details a series of tests comparing Seedream 3 and GPT40 using various prompts, such as a school yearbook page and an isometric 3D scene of a bedroom. The results show that while GPT40 generates higher quality and sharper images, Seedream 3 produces more realistic and imperfect results that look more like actual photographs.

05:01

🔍 Further Tests on Recursion and Human Anatomy

This paragraph continues the comparison between Seedream 3 and GPT40 by testing more complex prompts. The first test involves a recursive prompt of a person holding a photo of herself holding a photo of herself. Neither model gets the prompt entirely correct, but Seedream 3's results are more realistic despite being less accurate. The paragraph then tests the models' ability to generate human anatomy with prompts like a woman doing a handstand and a woman showing her palms and soles of her feet. Seedream 3 is found to be better at capturing realistic poses, while GPT40 generates sharper but more artificial-looking images. The overall conclusion is that Seedream 3 excels in realism and imperfection, making it more suitable for certain types of image generation.

10:02

🔍 Generating Characters and Art Styles

The paragraph explores the ability of Seedream 3 and GPT40 to generate images of existing characters and celebrities. Seedream 3 successfully generates images of Will Smith, Taylor Swift, Yao Ming, and Queen Elizabeth having dinner, although with some inaccuracies in details. In contrast, GPT40 refuses to generate the image due to policy restrictions. Seedream 3 also demonstrates its ability to generate fictional characters like Naruto, Nezuko, Goku, and Doraemon in a McDonald's setting, though it struggles with some character details. Additionally, the paragraph highlights Seedream 3's unique feature of using reference images to apply elements to new generations, including object detection, face recognition, and style transformation. However, GPT40 is noted to be better at accurately generating existing characters and transforming styles.

15:06

🔍 Realism and Text Generation

This paragraph tests the models' ability to generate low-quality, amateur photos and text. Seedream 3 generates realistic low-quality photos with imperfections, such as a teenager holding a handwritten note and a harsh flash photo from 1996. GPT40 also generates convincing low-quality photos but with slightly better imperfections like graininess and handwritten text. The paragraph then compares the models' text generation capabilities using prompts like a movie poster and a hand holding a pen writing in a diary. While Seedream 3 can generate text, GPT40 is superior in accuracy and consistency, especially for longer text snippets. Seedream 3 is noted to be better for generating handwritten Chinese characters, while GPT40 excels in overall text accuracy.

20:06

🔍 Art Style and Scene Generation

The paragraph evaluates the models' ability to generate various art styles and complex scenes. Seedream 3 successfully generates anime-style illustrations, 3D Pixar animation scenes, and Monet-style impressionist paintings. It is particularly praised for its ability to create realistic anime and 3D scenes. In contrast, GPT40 struggles with generating 3D scenes and certain art styles, often producing less accurate results. The paragraph also tests the models' ability to generate car models and uncommon animals, with Seedream 3 showing better accuracy in car logos and GPT40 performing better in generating realistic animals. Overall, Seedream 3 is highlighted for its versatility in art styles and realism.

25:07

🔍 Comprehensive Comparison and Pricing

This paragraph provides a comprehensive comparison of Seedream 3 and GPT40, summarizing their strengths and weaknesses. Seedream 3 is praised for its speed, ability to generate realistic photos, and less restrictive content policies, allowing for more diverse character generation. It is also noted for its superior performance in generating anime and 3D scenes. However, GPT40 excels in text generation, accuracy, and consistency, making it better suited for infographics and posters. The paragraph also discusses the pricing of Seedream 3, which offers 150 free credits per day and costs three credits per image, allowing users to generate up to 50 images daily. The author concludes that while both models have their strengths, Seedream 3 is a valuable tool for generating realistic and diverse images.

30:09

🎉 Final Thoughts and Conclusion

The final paragraph concludes the review of Seedream 3, emphasizing its strengths in generating realistic and diverse images, as well as its speed and versatility. The author encourages viewers to try Seedream 3 for free and share their experiences. The paragraph also highlights the importance of staying updated with AI news and tools, inviting viewers to subscribe to the author's newsletter for more insights. The author thanks viewers for watching and promises to continue sharing the latest AI developments in future videos.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Seedream 3.0

Seedream 3.0 is the latest image generation model developed by Byte Dance. It is a key focus of the video, being compared to other models like GPT40. The presenter tests its capabilities through various prompts, such as generating school yearbook pages, 3D scenes, and complex character arrangements. For example, the script mentions that Seedream 3.0 can generate a page of a school yearbook with a grid of student photos that looks realistic, even though the text and names are gibberish.

💡image generator

An image generator is a type of AI tool that creates images based on text prompts. In this video, Seedream 3.0 and GPT40 are compared as image generators. The presenter evaluates their performance by giving them different prompts and comparing the resulting images. For example, when asked to generate an isometric 3D scene of a bedroom, Seedream 3.0 produced more realistic results compared to GPT40, which seemed more polished but less accurate in some details.

💡realism

Realism refers to how closely an AI-generated image resembles a real-world photo or scene. The video emphasizes that Seedream 3.0 excels in generating images that look more realistic and less perfect compared to GPT40. For instance, when generating a yearbook page, Seedream's output had variations in student poses and hairstyles, making it look more like an actual yearbook photo, while GPT40's output appeared more uniform and polished.

💡art styles

Art styles refer to the different visual aesthetics that an image generator can produce. The video tests Seedream 3.0's ability to generate various art styles, such as anime, 3D Pixar animation, and Monet-style impressionist painting. For example, Seedream 3.0 was able to generate a 3D Pixar-style busy marketplace scene, while GPT40 struggled to produce a true 3D effect in its output.

💡text generation

Text generation is the ability of an AI model to create readable and coherent text within images. The video highlights that GPT40 is superior to Seedream 3.0 in text generation. For example, when asked to generate a movie poster with specific text, GPT40 produced accurate and consistent characters, while Seedream 3.0 had some errors in the text, although it generated a visually appealing scene.

💡anatomy

Anatomy refers to the structure and appearance of the human body. The video tests Seedream 3.0's ability to accurately depict human anatomy in various poses. For example, when generating a woman doing a handstand with one leg bent and the other extended, Seedream 3.0 was able to produce an accurate pose in one of its generations, while GPT40's output was generally more polished but not necessarily more accurate in terms of the specific pose requested.

💡censorship

Censorship in the context of AI image generation refers to the restrictions placed on the content that can be generated. The video notes that Seedream 3.0 is less censored than GPT40, allowing it to generate images of existing people or characters that GPT40 might block. For example, Seedream 3.0 was able to generate an image of Will Smith, Taylor Swift, Yao Ming, and Queen Elizabeth having dinner, while GPT40 refused to generate the image, citing policy violations.

💡resolution

Resolution refers to the size and clarity of the generated images. The video mentions that Seedream 3.0 can generate images in different resolutions, such as 1K square (1028x1028) or 2K (2048x2048). The presenter chose 1K resolution for comparison with GPT40, which also generates 1K images. The resolution affects the level of detail and quality of the generated images.

💡aspect ratio

Aspect ratio refers to the proportional relationship between the width and height of an image. The video discusses how Seedream 3.0 allows users to select different aspect ratios for their generated images. For example, the presenter chose a square aspect ratio for the yearbook page prompt, which is typical for such images. The aspect ratio can significantly impact the composition and appearance of the generated image.

💡recursive prompt

A recursive prompt is a type of text prompt that involves multiple layers of repetition or nesting. The video tests Seedream 3.0's ability to handle a recursive prompt where a person is holding a photo of herself holding a photo of herself, and so on. Neither Seedream 3.0 nor GPT40 was able to perfectly execute this prompt, but the example illustrates the complexity of recursive prompts and the challenges they pose to AI image generators.

Highlights

ByteDance has released a new image model called Seedream 3.0, which is reportedly tied with OpenAI's GBT40 in terms of performance according to an independent evaluator.

Seedream 3.0 is available for use at dreamina.capcut.com and offers different resolution and aspect ratio options.

The model is tested on various prompts, including generating a school yearbook page, an isometric 3D bedroom scene, and complex recursive prompts.

Seedream 3.0 generates more realistic and imperfect images compared to GPT40, which often produces overly polished results.

In terms of human anatomy, Seedream 3.0 accurately generates poses like a handstand, while GPT40's results are sharper but less realistic.

Seedream 3.0 can generate existing characters or celebrities in unique scenarios, such as Will Smith, Taylor Swift, Yao Ming, and Queen Elizabeth having dinner together.

The model includes a reference feature that allows users to apply elements from one generated image to another, including object detection and pose skeletons.

Seedream 3.0 is less censored than GPT40, allowing for more freedom in generating images of existing people or characters.

The model can generate images in various art styles, including anime, 3D Pixar animation, and Monet-style impressionist paintings.

Seedream 3.0 is particularly strong in generating realistic and low-quality amateur photos, capturing imperfections and natural aesthetics.

In text generation, GPT40 outperforms Seedream 3.0, especially in generating long snippets of text and infographics.

Seedream 3.0 is faster than GPT40, generating four images in about 10 seconds, compared to GPT40's longer wait times.

The model offers 150 free credits per day, allowing users to generate up to 50 images daily.

Seedream 3.0 is also capable of generating images of uncommon animals and fictional characters, though with varying degrees of accuracy.

Overall, Seedream 3.0 excels in realism and art style versatility, while GPT40 remains superior in text generation and detail consistency.