뤼튼(wrtn)과 ChatGPT를 비교해 보았습니다. 승자는?

The speaker introduces themselves as a writer for a new AI site and addresses a question about the differences between Lite (리튼) and other services like GPT. They discuss the various factors to consider when comparing these services, such as customization options and the underlying technology used. The speaker also mentions that Lite is a service that utilizes the GPT API but is offered for free, which raises concerns about its long-term sustainability.

The speaker provides a detailed comparison of the content and depth provided by Lite and GPT when asked to explain Donald Miller's Building a StoryBrand strategy. They note that Lite's response is more concise, while GPT provides a more detailed explanation. The speaker also compares the word count and depth of the explanations, finding that GPT's response is more comprehensive and takes longer to generate. They conclude that while Lite is a good service, GPT offers more detailed and helpful responses.

The speaker discusses the pricing and business models of Lite and GPT. They mention that they are paying a monthly fee to use GPT, while Lite is currently being offered for free. The speaker questions how Lite can sustain its free service in the long run and suggests that it may need to start charging fees or find other ways to generate revenue. They also compare the services in terms of the value they provide for different purposes, such as marketing or business development. The speaker concludes that both services have their merits and it depends on the user's specific needs and preferences.