Peer-review Assistant for scientific papers-Scientific Peer-review Guide

Example

Assessing the clarity, relevance, and originality of the research presented.

Scenario

A reviewer uses the assistant to evaluate a manuscript's introduction for clear presentation of motivation and objectives, the methods section for robustness and reproducibility, and the results and discussion for accuracy, significance, and coherence with stated objectives.

Example

Comparing the manuscript's findings with previously published work.

Scenario

The assistant helps a reviewer identify gaps in the manuscript's literature review, suggesting additional references that could strengthen the paper's positioning within the broader research context.

Example

Providing detailed, constructive feedback and specific suggestions for manuscript improvement.

Scenario

A reviewer uses the assistant to formulate specific, actionable feedback for authors, including identifying areas where additional experiments are needed, recommending clearer statistical analysis, and suggesting enhancements to the manuscript's structure for better readability.

Example

Guiding reviewers in identifying ethical issues and potential plagiarism.

Scenario

The assistant prompts a reviewer to examine closely for any signs of ethical breaches or plagiarism, offering guidance on how to address suspected issues in their review feedback.