ProtoRev-Medical Protocol Review

Example

Cross-referencing a sepsis protocol with the latest sepsis treatment guidelines.

Scenario

A clinical team uploads their sepsis management protocol. ProtoRev automatically cross-references the uploaded document with the latest clinical guidelines and research articles on sepsis treatment, highlighting any new recommendations for antibiotic therapy or supportive care that were not included in the hospital's existing protocol.

Example

Providing basic, intermediate, or advanced suggestions for a diabetes management protocol.

Scenario

Endocrinology department staff can choose the level of feedback they receive on their diabetes management protocol. For instance, selecting 'advanced' would provide in-depth suggestions, including cutting-edge treatment options and recent clinical trial data, while 'basic' might focus on fundamental best practices and core guideline updates.

Example

Tracking changes across multiple iterations of a cardiac arrest management protocol.

Scenario

As the cardiac arrest protocol goes through several rounds of reviews and updates, ProtoRev keeps track of all changes made. This ensures that the review committee can see how the protocol has evolved over time, understand the rationale behind each modification, and ensure that all changes are properly documented and justified.

Example

Enabling simultaneous protocol review and editing by different stakeholders.

Scenario

During the review of an emergency triage protocol, ProtoRev allows various stakeholders, such as physicians, nurses, and administrative staff, to provide input, suggest changes, and leave comments. This collaborative approach ensures a comprehensive and interdisciplinary review of the protocol.

Example

Ensuring a newly developed chemotherapy protocol complies with national safety standards.

Scenario

Upon uploading the chemotherapy protocol, ProtoRev assesses it against applicable national and international regulations. It then alerts the oncology department of any non-compliance issues, such as missing safety measures, and provides suggestions to address these gaps, ensuring the protocol adheres to all regulatory requirements.