🔥 Did I Rank With HarborSEO? Tried and Tested..

In this introductory segment, Vlad welcomes viewers to his video, where he plans to review and rank Harbor SEO in comparison to seven other popular AI writers. He shares that the video will focus on output quality, personal impressions, and whether Harbor SEO helps in ranking content. Vlad clarifies that he’s not an SEO expert or a large-scale business owner but simply someone who learns quickly and shares his experiences. He also mentions his AI writer directory, which allows users to filter based on specific features such as humanized text or infographic creation, with Harbor SEO being a newer tool featured in this directory.

This section details the current ranking of Harbor SEO, where Vlad objectively ranks it as sixth among the tools. He emphasizes that this ranking is not influenced by bias. He discusses its performance, highlighting that while Harbor SEO is still in development, it has unique features but lacks certain capabilities compared to others, like one-click SEO optimization. Its readability score is passable (grade 10), and it scores moderately well in terms of human-like output, at 15%. Vlad provides insight into how these rankings are calculated, based on SEO scores, user reviews, and technical features.

Vlad shares his personal challenges with Harbor SEO, discussing technical issues he has encountered, such as broken internal links and difficulties in preserving HTML formatting when pasting content. He acknowledges that while the tool is a work in progress, these issues are frequent, though they don't impact the overall ranking in his directory. He stresses that his rankings are based on a defined calculation, independent of his personal experience or control over how the scores are generated.

Here, Vlad questions the validity of ranking as a sole measure of an AI writer’s effectiveness. He draws from his experience using tools like GPT-4 and Agility Writer, which helped him achieve rankings for content in as little as a few hours. However, he emphasizes that maintaining rankings is more important than just achieving them. He explains how his latest article, created with Harbor SEO on the topic of AI humanizer tools, ranked well on the third spot. This ranking was based on a keyword suggested by Harbor SEO's research features, which he finds useful.

In this paragraph, Vlad delves into the article creation process using Harbor SEO. He highlights the content structure, mentioning a concise introduction, internal links, and visual aids such as diagrams and tables. However, he also points out a critical error where a tool was mentioned twice, illustrating the potential for inaccuracies in the tool's output. Vlad compares the performance of Harbor SEO with other AI tools, concluding that one article ranked while another did not. He suggests that evaluating an AI writer’s quality should involve testing multiple niches with standardized conditions.

In his closing thoughts, Vlad offers a summary of his experience with Harbor SEO, stating that despite some technical shortcomings, it performs reasonably well, especially in niche tasks like creating infographics and performing keyword research. He encourages viewers to explore the tool, read his full review, and subscribe to his newsletter for additional resources. Vlad expresses gratitude to his audience and signs off, leaving viewers with a positive but realistic impression of Harbor SEO.