AI가 그린 그림이 미술대회 1등해서 난리난 미술계 근황 / 스브스뉴스
TLDRA recent art competition in Colorado, USA, sparked controversy when a piece created by artificial intelligence (AI) won the grand prize. The winning artist, Jason Allen, used an AI tool called Midjourney to generate over 900 images, then curated and refined them to select three works for submission. The competition did not have guidelines against AI-generated art, leading to the award being upheld. Allen's victory has raised questions about the role of AI in the creative process and the definition of authorship. Critics argue that AI lacks the human effort and creativity inherent in traditional art, while others see AI as a tool, similar to a brush or design software. The debate extends to copyright law, as current laws only recognize works made by humans. As AI-generated content becomes more prevalent, discussions are ongoing about how to address intellectual property rights for such creations. The National Intellectual Property Committee in Korea is considering revisions to copyright law to accommodate AI-generated works, but challenges remain in determining who should hold the copyright and how to balance the rights of creators and consumers. The situation highlights the need for a nuanced approach to intellectual property in the age of AI.
Takeaways
- 🎨 An AI-generated artwork won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA, causing controversy in the art world.
- 🤖 The competition organizers did not reverse the award due to the lack of guidelines regarding AI-created works.
- 👤 Jason Allen, the winner, used an AI tool called 'Midjourney' to create over 900 images and selected three for submission.
- 📈 Allen utilized an AI named 'Gigapixel' to enhance the image resolution, which contributed to the winning entry.
- 💰 Allen received a $300 prize for his AI-assisted artwork, which cost $750 to submit.
- 😠 Many artists expressed anger and questioned the legitimacy of AI participation in creative competitions.
- 🧐 The debate arises whether AI creators or the users who direct them should be considered the authors of AI-generated works.
- 📚 AI can produce high-quality images by learning from vast amounts of data, leading to the question of originality in AI creations.
- 🇰🇷 In Korea, AI creations, like a collection of poems by AI Sia, have faced copyright issues as current laws only recognize human-made works.
- 🤔 The National Intellectual Property Committee in Korea is discussing the future of AI-generated content and its impact on copyright law.
- 📉 Producers of AI creations are hesitant to invest in technology without the possibility of copyright protection and profit.
- 📝 The committee recommended that humans or corporations contributing to AI creation be attributed copyright, and that the law be revised to exempt them from using works with big data.
Q & A
What caused a stir in the art world recently?
-The art world was recently thrown into turmoil when an artwork created by artificial intelligence won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA.
What was the name of the AI used to create the winning artwork?
-The AI used to create the winning artwork is called Midjourney.
How did the competition organizers respond to the AI-created artwork winning the grand prize?
-The competition organizers did not reverse the award as there were no direct guidelines against submitting creative works using AI.
What was the name of the artist who submitted the AI-created artwork?
-The artist who submitted the AI-created artwork is Jason Allen.
How much prize money did Jason Allen receive for winning the competition?
-Jason Allen received $300 in prize money for winning the competition.
What was the reaction of the art community to the AI artwork winning the competition?
-Many artists were angry and questioned the legitimacy of AI participation in the competition, arguing about the nature of authorship and the effort involved in creating art.
How does one use the AI tool 'Midjourney' to create an artwork?
-One can use the AI tool 'Midjourney' by signing up through an app called Discord, and then creating images by typing 'slash imagine' in the chat window to generate text-based prompts.
What is the role of the artist when using AI to create artwork?
-The artist's role involves curating and selecting the best images from hundreds created by the AI, tuning them, and deciding which ones to submit or showcase.
What are the current copyright laws regarding AI-created works?
-Current copyright laws recognize only works made by 'humans' as eligible for copyright protection, which poses a challenge for AI-created works.
What is the National Intellectual Property Committee's recommendation regarding AI and copyright law?
-The National Intellectual Property Committee recommended that humans or corporations contributing to the creation of AI should be attributed copyright and that the copyright law should be revised to exempt them from using works when utilizing big data.
What is the current stance of the Korean government on AI creations and copyright?
-The Korean government is in the process of conducting research and considering various overseas cases to address the issue. It has not yet enacted a specific law regarding the copyright of AI creations.
What is the significance of the AI artwork winning the grand prize in terms of the future of art and AI?
-The incident signifies a potential shift in the art world and raises important questions about the role of AI in creative processes, the definition of authorship, and the need for updated intellectual property laws to accommodate AI-generated content.
Outlines
🎨 AI Art Controversy: The Grand Prize Winner
The first paragraph discusses the controversy surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in creating art. It highlights the case of Jason Allen, who won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA, with a piece generated by AI. The competition did not have guidelines against AI submissions, leading to Allen's victory. Allen's process of using AI to create art is detailed, including the use of the Midjourney AI to generate over 900 images, and the 'Gigapixel' AI to improve image resolution. The paragraph also touches on the emotional response from human artists, questioning the legitimacy of AI as an artist and the effort involved in creating art with AI. It concludes with a broader discussion on the recognition of AI creations and the challenges copyright law faces in adapting to AI-generated works, including the establishment of a special AI-Intellectual Property Committee in Korea.
🤖 AI and Copyright: A Complex Dilemma
The second paragraph delves into the complexities of copyright law in relation to AI creations. It outlines the differing perspectives of stakeholders, such as producers who invest in AI technology but struggle with profitability due to the lack of copyright recognition, and consumers who may be faced with paying for AI creations they previously used for free. The paragraph discusses the National Intellectual Property Committee's recommendation to attribute copyright to humans or corporations contributing to AI creation and to revise the law to exempt the use of works when utilizing big data. The narrative acknowledges the challenges in enacting such laws and the ongoing research and international case studies that are informing the process. It concludes with a reflection on the rapid advancements in AI, as exemplified by AlphaGo's impact in 2016, and the anticipation of a forthcoming resolution to the issue of AI and copyright.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Artificial Intelligence (AI)
💡Grand Prize
💡Jason Allen
💡Midjourney
💡Gigapixel
💡Copyright
💡AI-Intellectual Property Committee
💡Kakao Brain
💡Discord
💡Creative Tools
💡Curation
Highlights
AI won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA.
The winning artwork was created using AI and submitted by Jason Allen.
The competition had no direct guidelines for submitting AI-generated works.
Allen used an AI called Midjourney to create over 900 images.
He selected 3 favorite works, improved them with an AI called Gigapixel, and submitted them.
Many artists were angry at Allen for using AI to create the winning artwork.
AI can create paintings in various styles by learning from a vast amount of data.
There is debate over whether AI creations should be considered art and if the AI user should be the author.
Allen argued that he contributed by selecting the best images from hundreds created by AI.
Kakao Brain published a poetry collection written by AI but failed to register copyright.
Current copyright law only recognizes works made by humans.
AI creations are increasingly used in music, art, and other fields, but no one claims copyright.
The National Intellectual Property Committee is discussing how to handle AI creations under copyright law.
There is disagreement over who should hold the copyright for AI-generated works.
Producers of AI creations invest in technology but may not profit from it due to lack of copyright.
Consumers may have to pay for AI creations if copyright is recognized.
The committee recommended that humans or corporations involved in creating AI be granted copyright.
They also suggested revising the law to allow exemption from using works when utilizing big data.
The copyright law may need to be revised to differentiate between AI and human creations.
The situation is complicated and further research and discussion are needed before enacting new laws.
