Best AI Presentation Maker (Compared ALL 21 tools)
TLDRThis video compares 21 AI presentation tools, highlighting the limitations and potential of current AI features in slide creation. It finds that while some tools show promise, such as Slides AI and Prezo, others like Plusdocs and Tome App have restrictions and inaccuracies. The verdict is that AI in presentation tools is still developing, with CoPilot by Microsoft showing potential for the future.
Takeaways
- 🔍 **AI Presentation Tools Overview**: The video compares 21 AI presentation tools, highlighting the current state of AI in presentations and noting that many tools treat AI as an afterthought rather than a core feature.
- 📉 **Lack of Innovation**: Some tools, like Slidebean's 'Arrange with AI' and Visme's AI image generator, were found to lack innovation, with the latter producing inconsistent images unsuitable for professional use.
- 🥇 **Promising Tools**: Out of 21 tools, 8 showed slightly better AI capabilities, but the presenter advises not to expect groundbreaking advancements, as the technology is still in its early stages.
- 📄 **Slides AI Limitations**: Slides AI, an extension for Google Slides, has limitations such as a character cap in its free plan and the need to specify slide numbers, which may not create the optimal number of slides.
- 🚀 **Prezo's Potential and Flaws**: Prezo, launched in December 2022, is free and can handle large documents but tends to overuse text and sometimes presents incorrect information, indicating it needs further development.
- 📈 **Plusdocs and Its Restriction**: Plusdocs, similar to Slides AI, is accessible via an add-on for Google Slides but has a restrictive free plan and produces text-heavy slides lacking clarity.
- 📊 **Tome App's Speed and Overload**: Tome App, introduced in March 2022, quickly converts text into slides but sometimes crams too much information onto a single slide, reducing clarity.
- 💡 **Sendsteps' Mislabeling Issue**: Sendsteps allows text input or direct document uploads but may mislabel slides and fail to communicate the essence of the document, indicating a need for improvement.
- 🤖 **CoPilot's Upcoming Integration**: CoPilot aims to convert Word documents into PowerPoint presentations and may integrate OpenAI's Dall-E for AI-powered image creation, but its real capabilities and quality are still speculative.
- 🏗️ **Room for Growth**: The overall assessment is that while the AI features in presentation tools are promising, they currently leave much to be desired, and the industry anticipates more developed and useful solutions in the future.
Q & A
How many AI presentation tools were tested in total?
-A total of 21 AI presentation tools were tested.
What was the general impression of the AI features in the tested tools?
-The AI features in the tested tools were often seen as an afterthought rather than a core feature, with some tools lacking significant AI capabilities.
What is the main limitation of Slides AI's free plan?
-The main limitation of Slides AI's free plan is a 2,500-character cap, which may make manual creation almost as efficient.
What issue did Prezo have with handling large documents?
-Prezo had issues with overusing text instead of using concise bullet points and sometimes presented incorrect information by assigning paragraphs to the wrong slides.
How does Plusdocs differ from Slides AI in terms of its free plan?
-Plusdocs' free plan is more restrictive, limiting input to only 1,000 characters, which is about 150 words.
What feature did Tome App demonstrate effectively during the testing?
-Tome App demonstrated effectiveness in recognizing headers and creating separate slides accordingly.
What was the main issue with Sendsteps when tested with a 4,400-word PDF?
-The main issue with Sendsteps was that it generated titles and outlines that mislabeled the content and failed to communicate the essence of the document.
What is the current status of Microsoft's CoPilot?
-As of the time of the script, CoPilot is still being tested by a select group of enterprise companies and is not yet available to the general public.
What is the general verdict on the AI features in presentation software according to the script?
-The general verdict is that while the current AI features in presentation software are underwhelming, there is optimism for the future with developments like Microsoft's CoPilot.
What was the main criticism of the text-to-presentation feature in various tools?
-The main criticism was that the text-to-presentation feature often produced unimpressive and text-heavy slides, lacking the desired clarity and effectiveness for professional use.
What did the script suggest about the future of AI in presentation tools?
-The script suggests that there is potential for growth and improvement in AI presentation tools, with a hopeful outlook towards more advanced and user-friendly features in the future.
Outlines
🤖 AI in Presentation Tools: A Critical Overview
This paragraph delves into the exploration of AI features in presentation tools, highlighting the capabilities such as turning text into presentations, creating slides from text, AI-adjusting text, and making AI images. The author tested AI features across 21 tools and found that 13 of them treated AI as an afterthought rather than a core feature. Some tools lacked significant AI capabilities, while others had functions that were underwhelming. The author discusses specific tools like Slidebean, Visme, Slides AI, Prezo, Plusdocs, and Tome App, pointing out their limitations and potential areas for improvement. The paragraph emphasizes that while these tools show promise, the current state of AI in presentations is not yet where it needs to be, and more development is required before they can be considered revolutionary or even fully useful.
📉 Testing AI Tools: A Mixed Bag of Results
The second paragraph focuses on the testing of various AI presentation tools, detailing the shortcomings and occasional misinterpretations of content by these platforms. The author provides specific examples of testing, such as Sendsteps mislabeling a slide and failing to capture the essence of the document. The paragraph also discusses the concept of topic-to-presentation AI features, expressing skepticism about their effectiveness in creating meaningful presentations without proper research or detailed information. The author shares personal experiences with tools like Slidesgo and Beautiful AI, noting that while these tools can produce visually appealing presentations, they often lack substance and relevance to the intended subject matter.
🚧 AI Features: Current Limitations and Future Hopes
In the final paragraph, the author reflects on the limitations of current AI features in presentation tools, such as the free plan of Tome App offering insufficient AI credits. The paragraph acknowledges that while these features may eventually reach a level of excellence, they are currently on a developmental journey. The author expresses disappointment with the AI tools' inability to accurately create a table of contents slide in Beautiful AI and concludes with a note of optimism for the future of AI in presentation software, particularly with the upcoming Microsoft CoPilot. The paragraph ends on a hopeful note, looking forward to advancements that may yet bring more practical and valuable AI capabilities to the field.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Presentation Maker
💡Text-to-Presentation
💡AI Image Generator
💡AI Edit
💡Topic-to-Presentation
💡Sendsteps
💡CoPilot
💡Tome App
💡Slides AI
💡Prezo
💡Plusdocs
Highlights
21 AI presentation tools were tested for their features and effectiveness.
13 out of 21 tools treated AI as an afterthought rather than a core feature.
Slidebean's 'Arrange with AI' feature was found to be lacking in innovation.
Visme's AI image generator produced inconsistent results, unsuitable for professional use.
8 tools showed slightly better AI capabilities but still fell short of groundbreaking advancements.
Slides AI transforms text documents into presentations but has limitations like a character cap.
Prezo, a free tool, can handle large documents but tends to overuse text and can present incorrect information.
Plusdocs, similar to Slides AI, has a restrictive free plan and produced text-heavy slides.
Tome App, launched in March 2022, excels at recognizing headers but crams too much text onto slides.
Sendsteps allows text input or document uploads but misrepresents content and lacks clarity in output.
CoPilot is being tested by enterprise companies and aims to integrate OpenAI's Dall-E for AI-powered image creation.
The text-to-presentation feature across various tools was found to be unimpressive in urgent situations.
Topic-to-presentation AI features feel random and misaligned with the purpose of presentations.
SlidesGo's AI presentation maker produced a presentation with the naivety of a child tackling complex subjects.
The 'text to slide' feature is a novel idea but lacks practical usefulness in current tools.
AI edit features in Beautiful AI and Tome App are not yet refined, leading to unintended results.
Tome App's free plan offers only 500 AI credits per month, which is not sufficient for practical use.
Microsoft's CoPilot holds promise for the future of AI in presentation software, but it is not yet widely available.