🔥How to Use Turnitin AI Detection Checker For FREE

WordsAtScale
22 Jun 202310:10

TLDRThe video discusses AI detection tools and their effectiveness in identifying AI-generated content. The creator shares a method to check outputs without using Turnitin and compares various AI detection tools, including CopyLeaks, Content at Scale, and Originality.ai. The experiment reveals that while some tools show high correlation with Turnitin, others like Originality.ai and CrossCheck are less reliable. The video concludes that if you have methods to bypass AI detection, using CopyLeaks can be a safe bet, and for transformed outputs, Content at Scale or CrossCheck can be used as proxies for Turnitin.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 The speaker emphasizes that AI detection should not be a concern unless you are in a niche market, academia, or writing for clients who use AI detection tools.
  • 📝 The video discusses a method to check AI-generated content without using Turnitin, which is a popular AI detection tool.
  • 📈 The speaker conducted an experiment by generating essays on popular topics and testing them with various AI detection tools.
  • 📊 The experiment included testing low-quality AI output, human-written output, and high-quality AI output to compare the accuracy of different AI detectors.
  • 🔎 The AI detectors tested were Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, CrossCheck, and Originality.ai, with a focus on their free versions.
  • 📝 The speaker's blog contains a review of the best AI content detectors, which helped in selecting tools for the experiment.
  • 🔄 The speaker used a tool called Undetectable.ai to alter the essays and make them more human-like, aiming to bypass AI detection.
  • 📉 Originality.ai was found to be unreliable when compared with Turnitin, showing a correlation of only 40%.
  • ✅ CopyLeaks Basic Model showed a 75% correlation with Turnitin, suggesting it could be a reliable alternative for AI detection.
  • 🔄 For altered outputs, Originality.ai consistently returned 0% AI, indicating it may not be effective in detecting transformed AI-generated content.
  • 🆓 Content at Scale and CrossCheck can be used as proxies for Turnitin, especially when they indicate high human scores for altered outputs.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the video?

    -The main topic of the video is AI detection, specifically focusing on how to check outputs for AI-generated content without using Turnitin.

  • Why shouldn't people be worried about AI detection?

    -People shouldn't be worried about AI detection unless they are in a niche market, academia, or writing for clients who use AI detection tools, as there is evidence that AI-generated content can rank on the first page of Google.

  • What was the first step in the experiment mentioned in the video?

    -The first step was to generate a list of 10 most popular essay topics using jgpd and then create a 1000-word essay for each topic.

  • Which AI detection tools were chosen for the experiment?

    -Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, CrossCheck, and Originality.ai were chosen for the experiment.

  • What was the purpose of using different AI detection tools?

    -The purpose was to compare the accuracy of different tools and to find proxies that could be used instead of Turnitin for checking AI-generated content.

  • What was the correlation between Turnitin and CopyLeaks Basic Model?

    -The correlation between Turnitin and CopyLeaks Basic Model was 75% of the time, indicating a strong similarity in their detection results.

  • How did the AI detection tools perform with altered outputs?

    -Originality struggled with altered outputs, giving zero percent AI scores, while CrossCheck and Content at Scale showed high human scores, indicating that the altered outputs passed as human-written.

  • What can be concluded from the experiment's results?

    -If you have your own methods for transforming outputs and want to check the basic state of AI-generated text, you can use CopyLeaks. For transformed outputs, you can use Content at Scale or CrossCheck to get a sense of how it would rank with Turnitin.

  • How can one bypass the limitations of CopyLeaks?

    -The limitations of CopyLeaks can be bypassed by changing the browser, turning VPN on and off, or changing the IP address.

  • What is the significance of the video's findings for content creators?

    -The findings suggest that content creators can use certain AI detection tools as proxies for Turnitin, which can be more accessible and cost-effective, especially if they have methods to transform their outputs to appear more human-like.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 AI Detection Concerns and Experiment Overview

The video begins with the creator discussing the common concerns about AI detection, emphasizing that it should not be a worry unless one is in a niche market, academia, or writing for clients who use AI detection. The creator shares their experience with AI-generated content ranking on Google and introduces an experiment to test AI detection tools. The process involves generating essays on popular topics, selecting AI detectors, and testing them against various outputs. The goal is to find a reliable tool that can be used without limitations, such as CopyLeaks, CrossBlack, and Content at Scale, and to compare their accuracy against Turnitin.

05:00

📊 Results and Analysis of AI Detection Tools

The creator presents the results of their experiment, comparing the effectiveness of different AI detection tools. They find that Originality.ai and CopyLeaks Basic Model show a high correlation, suggesting that CopyLeaks can be a reliable alternative to Turnitin. The experiment also tests the tools on altered AI-generated texts, with Originality.ai consistently showing zero percent AI, indicating its ineffectiveness in detecting transformed outputs. The creator concludes that for those who transform their outputs, tools like CrossBlack or Content at Scale can be used to check if the content would pass Turnitin, as they showed similar results.

10:01

🎥 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

The video concludes with the creator summarizing the findings and providing advice on how to use AI detection tools effectively. They suggest that if one has methods to bypass AI detection, using CopyLeaks can be a safe bet. For those who have transformed their outputs and want to gauge how they would fare with Turnitin, Content at Scale or CrossBlack can be used. The creator also mentions that these tools are either free or have easily bypassable limitations, making them accessible for various users.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI detection

AI detection refers to the process of identifying whether content has been generated by artificial intelligence, as opposed to a human. In the video, the speaker discusses the concerns people have about their content being detected as AI-generated, especially in academic or professional settings. The speaker provides insights on how to avoid AI detection and tests various tools for their effectiveness in detecting AI-generated content.

💡Torrented

In the context of the video, 'Torrented' seems to be a misspelling or mispronunciation of 'Turnitin,' which is a plagiarism detection service widely used in academic environments. The speaker uses this term to refer to the concern of content being flagged as AI-generated by such services. The video aims to address this concern by comparing different AI detection tools.

💡Niche

A niche refers to a specialized segment or market within a larger market. In the video, the speaker suggests that one should not worry about AI detection unless they are in a 'wild niche' or academia, implying that in most other cases, AI detection is not a significant concern. The term is used to highlight the specificity of the audience for whom AI detection might be an issue.

💡Essays

Essays are a form of writing that presents a discussion or explanation on a particular topic. In the video, the speaker generates a list of popular essay topics and creates 1000-word essays for each to test AI detection tools. Essays serve as the primary content type in the experiment to evaluate the accuracy of AI detection tools.

💡AI-generated content

AI-generated content refers to text, images, or other media created by artificial intelligence algorithms. The video's main theme revolves around the detection of such content, specifically in the form of essays. The speaker discusses methods to bypass AI detection and tests tools that can identify AI-generated essays.

💡Turnitin

Turnitin is a plagiarism detection service that checks the originality of student papers and other documents. It is used by educational institutions to ensure academic integrity. In the video, the speaker uses Turnitin as a benchmark for comparing the effectiveness of other AI detection tools.

💡Copyleaks

Copyleaks is an AI-powered plagiarism detection tool that helps identify copied content. The speaker includes Copyleaks in the comparison of AI detection tools, noting its limitations but also its usefulness for those who want to check their content without access to Turnitin.

💡Content at Scale

Content at Scale is an AI detection tool mentioned in the video. It is used as one of the free tools to test the originality of AI-generated essays. The speaker discusses its effectiveness and how it can be used as a proxy for Turnitin results.

💡Originality

Originality refers to the uniqueness or novelty of content. In the context of the video, the speaker discusses the Originality AI tool, which scores content based on its perceived originality. The tool is used to test the essays and compare its results with Turnitin's findings.

💡Correlation

Correlation is a statistical term that measures the degree to which two variables are related. In the video, the speaker uses correlation to compare the results of different AI detection tools with Turnitin's findings. A high correlation would suggest that the tool is reliable in detecting AI-generated content similarly to Turnitin.

💡Transformation

Transformation in this context refers to the process of altering AI-generated content to make it less detectable by AI detection tools. The speaker discusses using a tool called 'undetectable.ai' to transform essays and then tests these transformed outputs with various AI detection tools to see if they can pass as human-written.

Highlights

The video discusses AI detection and its relevance to various groups, emphasizing that only those in niche markets, academia, or writing for clients should be concerned.

The speaker has a consistent position on AI detection across their videos, suggesting that most people should not worry about it.

AI-generated content has been found ranking on the first page of Google, indicating that AI detection is not foolproof.

The video presents a trick to check outputs with AI detection without using Turnitin.

The speaker conducted an experiment by generating a list of popular essay topics and creating essays for each, then testing them with various AI detectors.

The experiment included testing low-quality AI outputs, human-written outputs, and high-quality AI outputs.

Several AI detectors were chosen for the experiment, including Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, and CrossBlack, which are mostly free or have easily bypassable limitations.

Originality.ai was also tested, but it was found to be less reliable when correlated with Turnitin scores.

CopyLeaks Basic Model showed a 75% correlation with Turnitin, suggesting it could be a reliable proxy for AI detection.

When outputs were altered using Undetectable.ai, Originality consistently returned 0% AI, indicating a potential flaw in its detection capabilities.

The average score for altered outputs was 0% AI, suggesting that transformation techniques can effectively bypass AI detection.

Content at Scale and CrossBlack were recommended for checking transformed outputs, as they indicated high human scores.

The video concludes that if you have methods to bypass AI detection and get good scores with CopyLeaks, you can assume similar results with Turnitin.

For those who want to gauge how their transformed outputs would rank with Turnitin without access to it, Content at Scale or CrossBlack can be used as proxies.

The video took considerable effort to produce, and the speaker encourages viewers to share and subscribe.