Round 3 - You’ve all Been Served

Harvey Freebird
6 Mar 202409:03

TLDRIn a dramatic City Council meeting, a member of the public, CJ Grisham, apologizes for his attire and speech, mocking the council's expectations of decorum. Grisham then announces a lawsuit against the council, accusing them of harassment and disrespecting constitutional rights, particularly targeting a local church and the homeless. The exchange is heated, with Grisham challenging the council's authority and accusing them of tyranny, while the council attempts to maintain order.

Takeaways

  • 🗣️ Public comment on agenda items is a right protected by Texas code 551.
  • 📝 The individual insists on addressing an active agenda item, despite being told it's not the right time.
  • 🤝 An apology is offered for past behavior, including dress code and communication style.
  • 👔 The apology extends to the way the individual has dressed for meetings, acknowledging the mayor's preference for a more formal attire.
  • 🗣️ The individual acknowledges the importance of the First Amendment and the right to free speech.
  • 📚 A reference is made to the lack of understanding regarding constitutional rights in the area.
  • 🙏 The individual apologizes for associating with a person deemed a criminal by Chief Blanchard.
  • 👮‍♂️ Criticism is directed at Chief Blanchard for his actions and the council's treatment of certain groups.
  • 🏛️ The individual challenges the council's authority and actions, particularly regarding a local church.
  • 📜 Legal action is threatened against the council for alleged violations of constitutional rights.
  • 🎥 The individual promises to continue contesting the council's actions and to expose them on YouTube.

Q & A

  • What is the Texas code 551 mentioned in the transcript?

    -Texas Code 551 refers to the Texas Public Information Act, which allows the public to access government records.

  • What is the agenda item number two that the speaker wants to comment on?

    -The specific content of agenda item number two is not provided in the transcript, but it is implied that it is a topic the speaker wishes to address during the public comment section of a city council meeting.

  • Why does the speaker believe they have the right to comment on the agenda item?

    -The speaker cites Texas Code 551, suggesting they believe it grants them the right to comment on public records, which they interpret as including the agenda items.

  • What is the speaker's issue with the way they have been treated at the meetings?

    -The speaker feels they have been unfairly interrupted and not allowed to comment on active agenda items, which they believe is a violation of their rights.

  • What does the speaker apologize for during the meeting?

    -The speaker apologizes for their attire, which they admit may not meet the professional standards expected at the meetings, and for their previous communication style, which they acknowledge may have been disrespectful.

  • What lawsuit does the speaker mention filing?

    -The speaker does not provide specific details about the lawsuit, but it is implied that it is related to the council's actions and their perceived violation of the speaker's rights.

  • How does the speaker address the issue of harassment against a church in town?

    -The speaker accuses Chief Blanchard of using HB1 1925 to harass a church, claiming that the chief is misapplying the law and that the church is on private property, not public.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the First and Fourteenth Amendments?

    -The speaker asserts their rights under the First Amendment (free speech) and the Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection under the law), claiming that the council has violated these rights.

  • Who does the speaker mention as their nemesis?

    -The speaker refers to Jason Fwell as their nemesis, suggesting a contentious relationship between the two.

  • What is the significance of the mention of 'Stone Cold' and 'Steve Austin'?

    -The speaker uses these references to add a dramatic flair to their speech, possibly to engage the audience and emphasize their point about being served with a lawsuit.

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ Public Comment and Agenda Dispute

The first paragraph depicts a contentious exchange during a city council meeting. A member of the public, presumably CJ Grisham, insists on commenting on agenda item number two, but is told by the council that it is not yet the appropriate time. The individual challenges the council's adherence to Texas code 551, which allows public comment, and expresses frustration at being told they are disrupting the meeting. The council maintains that each agenda item will be addressed in turn, and the individual is advised to wait for the correct moment to speak.

05:00

📜 CJ Grisham's Apology and Legal Action

In the second paragraph, CJ Grisham begins by apologizing for his attire and manner of speaking at previous meetings, referencing the expectation of decorum akin to a church. Grisham then sarcastically acknowledges the council's authority and expresses regret for not considering their perspective earlier. He accuses the council and police chief of harassment and misuse of power, specifically mentioning the enforcement of HB1 1925 against a church. Grisham also criticizes the council for what he perceives as selective enforcement of laws and for allowing certain individuals to speak at length while limiting others' First Amendment rights. He concludes by asserting his intention to continue fighting against what he sees as the council's injustices and disrespect for constitutional rights.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Texas Code 551

Texas Code 551 refers to the Texas Public Information Act, which provides the public with the right to access government records. In the video, the speaker cites this code to assert their right to comment on agenda items during a public meeting, highlighting the importance of transparency and public participation in government proceedings.

💡Agenda Item

An agenda item is a specific topic or matter scheduled for discussion at a formal meeting. In the context of the video, the speaker is attempting to address a particular agenda item, which becomes a point of contention and underscores the tension between public input and the meeting's procedural rules.

💡Citizen Comment

Citizen comment is a segment of a public meeting where individuals can voice their opinions or concerns. The video script shows a clash over when and how citizens can comment, reflecting the broader issue of public engagement and the right to be heard in government settings.

💡Disruption

Disruption in this context refers to the act of interrupting or disturbing the orderly conduct of a meeting. The speaker is accused of disrupting the meeting by insisting on commenting on an agenda item out of turn, which illustrates the delicate balance between maintaining order and allowing for public participation.

💡Apology

An apology is a formal expression of regret for an action or offense. In the video, CJ Grisham offers an apology for his previous behavior, including his attire and speech, which is a strategic move to acknowledge past actions while also subtly criticizing the council's expectations and actions.

💡Lawsuit

A lawsuit is a legal action taken by one party against another in a court of law. The mention of a lawsuit in the video suggests that there are ongoing legal disputes related to the council's actions, particularly concerning First Amendment rights and the treatment of citizens and churches.

💡First Amendment

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. In the video, the speaker references the First Amendment to argue against what they perceive as violations of their right to free speech and to address the council.

💡14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ensures equal protection under the law and due process for all citizens. The speaker alleges that their 14th Amendment rights were violated when they were not allowed to speak, suggesting a broader issue of fairness and constitutional rights in the council's operations.

💡Harassment

Harassment refers to behavior that is intended to annoy, intimidate, or harm another person. In the video, the speaker accuses the council and Chief Blanchard of harassment, particularly towards a church and homeless individuals, which reflects a theme of perceived injustice and abuse of power.

💡Constitution Rights

Constitution rights are the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by a country's constitution. The video's narrative revolves around the assertion and defense of these rights, particularly in the context of public meetings and interactions with local government officials.

💡Public Participation

Public participation involves the process by which members of the public engage in decision-making processes, particularly in government settings. The video script emphasizes the importance of public participation and the challenges faced when individuals attempt to exercise their right to be involved in public affairs.

Highlights

Citizen's right to address the government body according to Texas code 551.

The meeting's agenda and the timing for public comments.

CJ Grisham's apology for his attire and demeanor at previous meetings.

CJ Grisham's reference to the First Amendment and the 1791 Constitution.

CJ Grisham's acknowledgment of the mayor's comment about the decorum of the meeting.

CJ Grisham's mention of not having access to the city's credit card for purchasing a suit.

CJ Grisham's apology for associating with Jason Followell, who was labeled as a criminal.

CJ Grisham's statement about the importance of respecting and obeying police chiefs.

CJ Grisham's claim of being threatened with arrest for reading Supreme Court words.

CJ Grisham's lawsuit against the city council.

Jason Followell's response to CJ Grisham's comments.

CJ Grisham's defense of his First Amendment rights during the meeting.

CJ Grisham's accusation of the council's harassment against a local church.

CJ Grisham's criticism of the council's treatment of citizens and the homeless.

CJ Grisham's challenge to the council's legal knowledge and authority.

CJ Grisham's call for the council to stop harassing the church and respect their rights.

CJ Grisham's final statement about contesting the council's actions and the mention of being served.

Create Stunning AI Art Instantly

No login. No cost. Just incredible AI images !

Create Stunning AI Art InstantlyGenerate Now