Why 90% Research Articles Get Desk Rejection From Scopus Index Journals? How to Avoid Desk Rejection
TLDRIn this video, Dr. Muni Naser discusses the common reasons why 90% of research articles face desk rejection from Scopus indexed journals. Key reasons include a lack of research gap, improper journal formatting, and plagiarism. To avoid rejection, emphasize the research gap in the introduction, adhere strictly to journal formatting guidelines, and avoid plagiarism by using AI tools responsibly.
Takeaways
- 📄 **Research Gap Importance**: Mention a significant research gap in the first two paragraphs of the introduction to avoid desk rejection.
- 🖊️ **Journal Formatting**: Adhere strictly to the journal's author guidelines for formatting to prevent immediate desk rejection.
- 🚫 **Avoid Plagiarism**: Ensure your manuscript is free from plagiarism and has low similarity indexes to pass the desk editorial board.
- ✅ **Use AI Tools Wisely**: Utilize AI tools for assistance but rely on your own writing to maintain originality and avoid plagiarism.
- 🔍 **Initial Screening**: The first step in the submission process is a quick check by the desk editor, focusing on the research gap and alignment with journal scope.
- 🔗 **Alignment with Journal Scope**: Make sure your research is aligned with the journal's aims and scope to increase the chances of moving past the initial screening.
- 📈 **Research Gap Clarity**: Clearly articulate the research gap in the introduction to show the importance and relevance of your study.
- 📑 **Follow Guidelines**: Following the journal's guidelines for manuscript preparation is crucial for acceptance beyond the initial review.
- 📝 **Originality**: Write your manuscript with original content and proper paraphrasing to ensure it passes plagiarism checks.
- 🔄 **Balance AI Use**: Balance the use of AI tools with your own writing to maintain the authenticity and quality of your research article.
Q & A
Why do 90% of research articles get desk rejection from Scopus index journals?
-90% of research articles get desk rejection mainly due to the lack of a significant research gap, non-adherence to journal formatting guidelines, and plagiarism or similarity issues.
What is the role of the research gap in the acceptance of a research article by a Scopus index journal?
-The research gap is crucial as it demonstrates the need for the study. If a research gap is not clearly mentioned in the introduction, particularly in the first two or three paragraphs, the paper is likely to be desk rejected.
How important is it to follow the author guidelines when submitting a research article to a Scopus index journal?
-Following the author guidelines is extremely important as it ensures that the manuscript is formatted correctly. Failure to do so can lead to immediate desk rejection.
What are the three main reasons for desk rejection as mentioned by Dr. Muni Naser?
-The three main reasons for desk rejection mentioned by Dr. Muni Naser are the lack of research gap, lack of journal formatting, and plagiarism or similarity issues.
Why is it advised to mention the research gap in the first paragraph of the introduction?
-Mentioning the research gap in the first paragraph ensures that the journal editors understand the significance and necessity of the study, which is crucial for the paper to proceed to the review stage.
What is the impact of not following the journal's formatting guidelines on the likelihood of desk rejection?
-Not following the journal's formatting guidelines can lead to immediate desk rejection as it shows a lack of adherence to the journal's standards and expectations.
How can researchers avoid plagiarism or similarity issues in their research articles?
-Researchers can avoid plagiarism or similarity issues by being honest, using paraphrasing tools responsibly, and ensuring that they write key paragraphs themselves to maintain originality.
What is the advice given by Dr. Muni Naser regarding the use of AI in writing research articles?
-Dr. Muni Naser advises against solely depending on AI for writing entire manuscripts. Instead, he suggests using AI tools for assistance while maintaining a balance with the researcher's own writing to ensure originality.
What are the two types of desk rejection mentioned in the transcript?
-The two types of desk rejection mentioned are immediate desk rejection and desk rejection after checking the journal's similarity and cross-referencing, which precedes the review stage.
How can following the three important steps help a research article get past the desk editorial board?
-By clearly stating the research gap, adhering to journal formatting guidelines, and avoiding plagiarism or similarity issues, a research article is more likely to get past the desk editorial board and proceed to the reviewer stage.
What is the significance of the first two or three paragraphs in the introduction section of a research article submission?
-The first two or three paragraphs in the introduction are significant as they set the stage for the research gap and the study's relevance, which are key factors in determining whether the article will be desk rejected or proceed to review.
Outlines
📚 Understanding Research Article Rejection
Dr. Muni Naser discusses the common reasons why research articles get rejected by journal editors. The primary focus is on the importance of identifying a significant research gap in the introduction section of the paper, which is crucial for getting past the initial editorial review. Dr. Naser emphasizes that many submissions are rejected due to a lack of research gap and improper formatting according to the journal's guidelines. Additionally, the paragraph warns against over-reliance on AI tools for writing, which can lead to plagiarism and similarity issues. Instead, researchers are advised to paraphrase and write with their own understanding to ensure originality and context relevance.
🔑 Keys to Avoiding Editorial Rejection
This paragraph outlines three key strategies to avoid immediate rejection by the editorial board. Firstly, it stresses the need to clearly articulate the research gap or problem in the introduction section. Secondly, it highlights the importance of adhering to the journal's formatting guidelines, which includes following the author guidelines meticulously. Lastly, it advises against plagiarism and similarity, suggesting the use of paraphrasing tools and personal writing to maintain originality. By following these steps, the likelihood of a paper progressing to the reviewer stage increases, potentially leading to a successful publication in a Scopus-indexed journal.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Desk Rejection
💡Research Gap
💡Aims and Scope
💡Author Guidelines
💡Formatting
💡Plagiarism
💡Peer Review
💡Scopus Index
💡Methodology
💡Manuscript
💡Revision
Highlights
90% of research articles get desk rejection from Scopus index journals.
Research articles are often rejected due to not being suitable or aligned with the journal's aims and scope.
The lack of a significant research gap is a primary reason for desk rejection.
Mentioning the research gap in the introduction is crucial for passing the desk editorial board.
Proper journal formatting is essential to avoid immediate desk rejection.
Following the author guidelines is key to formatting a research article correctly.
Templates provided by publishers like Elsevier and Springer should be adhered to for formatting.
Plagiarism is a common issue that leads to desk rejection.
Using AI tools for writing can introduce plagiarism and should be balanced with original writing.
Paraphrase key paragraphs to ensure a low similarity index and avoid plagiarism.
There are two types of desk rejection: immediate and after checking for similarity and cross-referencing.
To pass the desk editorial board, emphasize the research gap, follow formatting guidelines, and avoid plagiarism.
If a paper passes the desk editorial board, it moves on to the reviewer stage for potential revisions.
Following the three key steps increases the chance of a good publication in a Scopus index journal.
The importance of mentioning the research gap in the first paragraph of the manuscript.
The necessity of formatting research papers according to the journal's author guidelines.
The advice against relying solely on AI for writing to prevent plagiarism and ensure originality.