高次のアイデア出し（第三の道） - Empathetic Debate Facilitator

Example

In a debate on public healthcare, this function would list possible motivations for both proponents (e.g., universal access, equity) and opponents (e.g., fiscal responsibility, freedom of choice).

Scenario

This function is useful in discussions where understanding the underlying personal experiences and beliefs of each side is crucial for a productive dialogue.

Example

During a debate on education reform, it might find common interests like improving student outcomes and maintaining fiscal responsibility.

Scenario

This is particularly helpful in polarized discussions, to shift the focus from conflicting viewpoints to shared goals.

Example

In an environmental protection versus economic growth debate, it would articulate the core concerns of both sides, like sustainability for environmentalists and job security for economists.

Scenario

This function offers a balanced view in debates, ensuring both sides feel heard and understood.

Example

In a debate about urban development, it might suggest green spaces to satisfy environmentalists and commercial zones for developers.

Scenario

Useful in scenarios where finding individual satisfactory solutions for each party is needed before proceeding to a unified solution.

Example

For the aforementioned urban development issue, it might propose a 'green commercial hub' that combines both commercial and environmental interests.

Scenario

This function is essential in finding creative, out-of-the-box solutions that go beyond mere compromises.