Elicit vs. SciSpace Literature Review Tool: How to use both tools to quickly find literature
TLDRThis video compares Elicit and SciSpace Literature Review Tool, two free AI-driven literature review tools. It evaluates their features and performance in retrieving relevant literature on the separation of steroid isomers using ion mobility spectrometry. The comparison includes the accuracy of the information provided, the range of papers retrieved, the filters and sorting options available, and the ability to export or save search results. The video concludes that both tools have their strengths and can be used complementarily for a comprehensive literature review.
Takeaways
- 🔍 Elicit and SciSpace Literature Review Tools are both free and compared for features and performance in finding relevant literature, not pricing.
- 🤓 The video demonstrates a practical test using a specific query about steroid isomers and ion mobility spectrometry to evaluate the accuracy of results from both tools.
- 📚 Elicit tends to fetch more recent research and relevant papers quickly, sometimes showing papers from as recent as 2019-2020.
- 📉 SciSpace's tool sometimes retrieves older studies, which might not be as relevant to cutting-edge queries but includes a broader historical perspective.
- 🔬 Both tools offer filters for refining searches, such as publication year and study type, enhancing the relevance of search results.
- 🔎 Keyword filtering in Elicit can narrow down results to increase relevancy, especially useful when specific details like 'steroid' are crucial to the query.
- 📅 SciSpace allows for more detailed filtering options, which can be adjusted to include only papers from the last five years, for instance.
- 📈 The sorting options in both tools are similar, allowing users to organize results by relevance, citation count, and publication year, among others.
- 🤖 SciSpace integrates a chatbot AI research assistant that helps ask detailed questions about grouped papers, offering an interactive way to explore literature.
- 💾 Both platforms provide options to export search results, which is handy for citation management and further analysis.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the video?
-The main focus of the video is to compare and contrast the features and performance of two literature review tools, Elicit and SciSpace, in finding the most relevant literature based on a specific question.
How do the tools differ in terms of the specificity of the question they can handle?
-Elicit and SciSpace both can handle very specific questions. The video demonstrates this by asking a detailed question about techniques used to separate steroid isomers in ion mobility spectrometry.
What is the accuracy of the results provided by the two tools?
-The results provided by both tools are mostly accurate, with each tool citing correct techniques such as TWINS (using metal induction) and trapped ion mobility spectrometry. However, there is a minor discrepancy in citing the correct journal for one of the papers.
How do the tools differ in the recency of the papers they retrieve?
-Elicit tends to retrieve more recent papers, while SciSpace initially provides older papers. However, after applying filters, both tools can be adjusted to focus on recent literature.
What type of filters can be applied in each tool to refine the search results?
-SciSpace allows filtering by PDF availability, publication type, and publication year, while Elicit offers filters for study type and the ability to specify keywords in the abstract.
How do the tools handle the sorting and organization of results?
-Both tools offer sorting options. Elicit allows sorting by title, abstract summary, PDF availability, year, and citations, while SciSpace can sort by relevance, citations, and year.
What unique features do each of the tools offer?
-SciSpace provides a more detailed breakdown in its table format, including specific columns for insights, conclusions, introduction, method used, literature survey, limitations, contributions, and practical implications. Elicit, on the other hand, allows for the export of more detailed information and offers a semantic scholar URL.
How do the tools assist in exporting or saving search information?
-SciSpace allows for the saving of searches through its integrated AI research assistant, Co-Pilot, and offers export to CSV. Elicit enables the export of results as a BibTeX text file or CSV, and also provides the option to add custom columns for export.
What is the benefit of using both tools together?
-Using both tools together can provide a more comprehensive view of the literature. They may retrieve different papers, and their different features and filters can be used to refine and enhance the search results.
How does the video suggest verifying the information provided by the AI tools?
-The video suggests double-checking the information provided by the AI tools against the original sources to ensure accuracy before using it in research or decision-making.
What additional resources are suggested for those struggling with research reading and understanding?
-The video suggests a 30-day research jumpstart guide for those who need help with reading and understanding research papers in their field.
Outlines
🔍 Comparison of Literature Review Tools
This paragraph introduces a video that compares two literature review tools, Size Spaces and Elicit. The focus is on comparing features and performance rather than pricing, as both tools are free. The video creator uses a field they are familiar with to test the tools' accuracy in providing relevant literature on techniques used for separating steroid isomers using ion mobility spectrometry. Both tools are evaluated based on the speed of results, accuracy of information, and relevance of the papers provided.
📈 Analysis of Search Results and Filters
The second paragraph delves into the analysis of the search results obtained from both tools. The video creator compares the papers provided by each tool, noting the recency and relevance of the papers. They discuss the filters available on each platform, such as publication year and keyword specificity, to refine the search results. The paragraph highlights the differences in the papers retrieved and the importance of using filters to increase the relevancy of the search results.
📊 Examination of Detailed Information and Sorting Options
This paragraph examines the detailed information provided by each tool, such as abstract summaries and specific findings from the research. The video creator compares the sorting options available on both platforms, including by title, relevance, and year. They discuss the benefits of using these tools to extract information from articles in a tabular format and the ease of accessing additional details about the studies.
💬 Discussion on AI Integration and Exporting Features
The final paragraph discusses the integration of AI research assistants, such as Size Spaces' Co-Pilot, and the ability to export or save search information. The video creator contrasts the capabilities of each tool in terms of saving searches and exporting detailed information about the papers. They note the current limitations of each platform and suggest that using both tools can provide a more comprehensive understanding and allow for cross-checking the accuracy of the information obtained.
🚀 Conclusion and Additional Resources
In the concluding paragraph, the video creator summarizes the comparison between the two literature review tools and suggests that viewers may benefit from exploring both platforms. They offer additional resources for viewers who are interested in improving their research skills or looking for guidance on selecting research papers to read, including a 30-day research jumpstart guide and links to both tools in the video description.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Elicit
💡SciSpace Literature Review Tool
💡Literature Review
💡Steroid Isomers
💡Ion Mobility Spectrometry
💡Filters
💡Co-Pilot
💡Exporting Information
💡Abstract Summary
💡Relevancy
💡Research Papers
Highlights
Comparison of Elicit and SciSpace literature review tools without considering pricing, focusing on feature performance.
Detailed query example used: techniques for separating steroid isomers using ion mobility spectrometry.
Analysis of the speed and initial results of both tools, showing comparable times but varying accuracies.
Insight into the tools' results: Elicit's data is slightly less accurate in citing the correct sources compared to SciSpace.
SciSpace displays older research in its results, providing a historical perspective on the topic.
Comparison of the relevance and recency of papers suggested by each tool, highlighting SciSpace's focus on newer studies.
Both tools allow filtering by publication type, year, and whether the paper is open access.
Elicit offers additional filtering options including keywords in the abstract to enhance search relevancy.
Highlight of the similarity in papers presented by both tools, with approximately half overlapping in suggested literature.
Examination of the sorting features in both tools, including options to sort by title, year, and citation count.
Analysis of the detailed extraction capabilities of each tool, presenting data in tabular formats for quick insights.
Exploration of unique features like Elicit's ability to conduct keyword-specific searches.
Introduction of SciSpace's AI assistant, Co-Pilot, enhancing interaction with the search results.
Comparative look at the export capabilities of both tools, including options to save and export search results.
Recommendation to use both tools in conjunction to gain a comprehensive understanding of the literature in any given field.